28 Sep '13 01:42>
Marine life was more robust in those days and the oceans were not as salty as they are today. Noah's ark was a more sea worthy vessel than others had.
The Instructor
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHindsYou THINK you have an answer for everything when in fact you have nothing but fairy tales.
Marine life was more robust in those days and the oceans were not as salty as they are today. Noah's ark was a more sea worthy vessel than others had.
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHindsWhat do you mean when you say marine life was more robust? There were more species or the species that exist were more capable of surviving a flood?
Marine life was more robust in those days and the oceans were not as salty as they are today. Noah's ark was a more sea worthy vessel than others had.
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHinds
Marine life was more robust in those days and the oceans were not as salty as they are today. Noah's ark was a more sea worthy vessel than others had.
The Instructor
Marine life was more robust in those days
and the oceans were not as salty as they are today.
Noah's ark was a more sea worthy vessel than others had.
Originally posted by humyThe fact that humans were able to live to be 900 years old is evidence of being robust. The fact that some dinosaurs were so large is evidence that reptiles were living longer than they do today. It seems clear that all biological life on earth has been degenerating from the time of the original creation making them less robust than at the beginning.Marine life was more robust in those days
More “robust” in what way? And what made them more 'robust'? And what made them less 'robust' in the present day? And what evidence have you for all this? And how do you know all this?and the oceans were not as salty as they are today.
That would mean many of the current o ...[text shortened]... nd save themselves from drowning as the water levels raised up? 😛 You’re not making any sense.
Originally posted by RJHindsYes, the "FACT" that people lived 900 years. What a joke.
The fact that humans were able to live to be 900 years old is evidence of being robust. The fact that some dinosaurs were so large is evidence that reptiles were living longer than they do today. It seems clear that all biological life on earth has been degenerating from the time of the original creation making them less robust than at the beginning.
The Instructor
Originally posted by RJHinds
The fact that humans were able to live to be 900 years old is evidence of being robust. The fact that some dinosaurs were so large is evidence that reptiles were living longer than they do today. It seems clear that all biological life on earth has been degenerating from the time of the original creation making them less robust than at the beginning.
The Instructor
The fact that humans were able to live to be 900 years old is evidence of being robust.
The fact that some dinosaurs were so large is evidence that reptiles were living longer than they do today.
It seems clear that all biological life on earth has been degenerating from the time of the original creation making them less robust than at the beginning.
Originally posted by humyIt's one of the effects of cognitive dissonance, logic goes out the window as does critical thinking. There is ZERO critical thinking when it comes to RJ Hinds.The fact that humans were able to live to be 900 years old is evidence of being robust.
what on earth are you talking about? OBVIOUSLY, it is NOT a fact that “ humans were able to live to be 900 years old”! if that is a “fact” then, logically, there must be evidence for it! So WHERE is this evidence? Show us please. I don't know were you ...[text shortened]... e of words like “robust” and this indicates to us extremely woolly-headed thinking on your part.
Originally posted by humyJust an interpretation of the historical and scientific facts, man. That's all.The fact that humans were able to live to be 900 years old is evidence of being robust.
what on earth are you talking about? OBVIOUSLY, it is NOT a fact that “ humans were able to live to be 900 years old”! if that is a “fact” then, logically, there must be evidence for it! So WHERE is this evidence? Show us please. I don't know were you ...[text shortened]... e of words like “robust” and this indicates to us extremely woolly-headed thinking on your part.
Originally posted by RJHindsThere are no 'facts' here, only delusional fairy tales that humans ever lived a thousand years. It is really pathetic that a grown man in the 21st century can still believe that nonsense.
Just an interpretation of the historical and scientific facts, man. That's all.
The Instructor
Originally posted by sonhouseIt is pathetic that a grown man over 70 years of age still believes that man came into existence by a series of chance happenings by the delusional fairy tale of Evil-lution.
There are no 'facts' here, only delusional fairy tales that humans ever lived a thousand years. It is really pathetic that a grown man in the 21st century can still believe that nonsense.
Originally posted by RJHindsBleat all you want, it won't change the nature of the universe one whit. It goes on in spite of your childish ways.
It is pathetic that a grown man over 70 years of age still believes that man came into existence by a series of chance happenings by the delusional fairy tale of Evil-lution.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5W763lQR0tU
From a Frog to a Prince
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMoWfPn2pCI
The Instructor