Apes and evolution

Originally posted by @sonhouse
I really want to see that thesis paper.

I want even more to see that thesis paper by freakykbh arguing for the Earth being flat; we all could do with a big laugh.

Are Chaney and MrFreak pretty much the same kind?
The kind that 'Because I say so' is offered as a proof of their pseudo facts?

Hey chaney3, I don't take you seriously here. I'll remember that whenever I see a post from you.

Kudos to some very patient posters in this thread.

Originally posted by @apathist
Hey chaney3, I don't take you seriously here. I'll remember that whenever I see a post from you.

Kudos to some very patient posters in this thread.

Is anyone here at Science Forum taking chaney seriously? No, I don't think so.

Originally posted by @fabianfnas
Is anyone here at Science Forum taking chaney seriously? No, I don't think so.

Wait...wut?

We are suppose to take each other seriously?

Originally posted by @whodey
Wait...wut?

We are suppose to take each other seriously?

So I guess asking a question expecting a serious answer is a no no on the internet. How naive I have been all these years.

Originally posted by @chaney3
No prediction exists, just guesses from Darwin. And yes, he guessed.

NO apes, or any relative of ape should exist today. They should all be human.

Your ignorance would be funny if it weren't displayed through the same tired old arguments easily debunked years ago

Chimps (and other apes) and humans share a common ancestor. From that ancestor chimps ecolved one way, we and the other hominids evolved another way. It just happens that ancestor became extinct, it isn't a requirement

Another thing:
Darwin is simply the first to come up with this theory, the one who figured out the basics. Since then we come a long way. Trying to dismantle the theory of evolution by looking for inconsistencies in Darwin's work is like teying to disprove physics by pointing greek philosophers from 2000 years ago didn't know quarks existed

Originally posted by @zahlanzi

Another thing:
Darwin is simply the first to come up with this theory, the one who figured out the basics. Since then we come a long way. Trying to dismantle the theory of evolution by looking for inconsistencies in Darwin's work is like trying to disprove physics by pointing greek philosophers from 2000 years ago didn't know quarks existed[/b]

I think that is a good point.
Just for starters, Darwin assumed that evolution always occurs at a constant unvarying rate. We now know that is definitely false i.e. he was wrong about that because of the powerful evidence for punctuated evolution;

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Punctuated_equilibrium

I have heard at least one person attempt to argue against evolution by pointing out this evidence against evolution always occurs at a constant unvarying rate and thus Darwin was wrong about that and then claim that, because Darwin was wrong about that, evolution must be wrong! What they don't understand that whether Darwin was wrong about that is irrelevant to whether evolution is correct because there is no contradiction in it occurring at a variable rate.
In addition, much of the evidence for punctuated evolution IS, unsurprisingly, evidence for evolution.

In addition, he didn't know HOW inherited characteristics mutate nor HOW that information of inherited characteristics is represented in living things because he didn't know about genes or DNA. Does that mean evolution must be wrong? -of course not.

If evolution were true, all apes and monkeys would be humans by now.

Your 'science' is weak.

obviously panspermia..

Originally posted by @chaney3
If evolution were true, all apes and monkeys would be humans by now.

why would that be?
The theory of evolution doesn't say nor imply this.

Originally posted by @ogb
obviously panspermia..

indubitably obvious..

Originally posted by @chaney3
If evolution were true, all apes and monkeys would be humans by now.

Your 'science' is weak.

Again chaney shows his ignorance.

Originally posted by @chaney3
If evolution were true, all apes and monkeys would be humans by now.

Your 'science' is weak.

What I wonder is who is feeding you this bullshyte? Like Freaky, he gets his bullshyte from other people. You are obviously in the same category. So can you admit these are not your ideas and tell us who you are plagiarizing?