Originally posted by Metal Brain
Interesting how you omitted the word "skeptical" in a feeble attempt to mislead others into thinking I was talking about science in general and not the skeptical science website as I clearly did. Skeptical science lies and googlefudge put forth that website and you yourself indicated it as evidence and that is laughable. Singer was telling the truth abou ...[text shortened]... so they stop hating us, right? It has worked well so far. They are about to love us any day now.
Interesting how you omitted the word "skeptical" in a feeble attempt to mislead others into thinking I was talking about science in general
Not at all: I expect others to notice that what you call “skeptical science” for whatever moronic reason, most people call real science thus no deception made of what you think.
The earth has been warming before fossil fuel burning was affecting climate.
for the current warming period or the past ones?
Either way: How would that change the fact of man made warming of the current warming?
We are probably seeing the lag CO2 increase later than the natural warming that caused it.
again, for the current warming period or the past ones?
This makes the amount of CO2 increase caused by man debatable.
Nope, it logically doesn't. Your above conclusion doesn't logically follow from your premise. HOW does CO2 not initializing a start of a warming mean that it is “ debatable” that CO2 causes warming? Natural causes can initialize the start of a warming period and then CO2 can greatly amplify it.
Given how essential CO2 is to life on earth it is surprising how little of it is in the atmosphere.
correct -although that doesn't mean life wouldn't be harmed by too much of it.
Burning fossil fuels is probably doing more good than harm.
again, your conclusion doesn't logically follow from your premise; HOW does CO2 being essential to life mean burning fossil fuels is probably doing more good than harm? That is like saying an fat man eating too many calories is probably doing himself more good than harm because calories are essential to life -same illogic.
Another example; vitamins are essential to life (at least for most/all vertebrates). Haven't you heard of vitamin poisoning?
The rest of your post is just false assertions without argument.
That CO2 doesn't matter to you though, does it? As long as they kill people that CO2 is just fine with you, right?
What on earth are your talking about? Please don't be obtuse; nobody here thinks/says it is generally OK to kill people either for oil or CO2 and you are being dishonest by pretending we generally would want such killing.