Originally posted by Metal Brain
It is as absurd as trying to show that smoking cannabis causes lung cancer.
Yet another of your many idiotic delusional statements.
http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/cancers-in-general/cancer-questions/does-smoking-cannabis-cause-cancer
"....
Cannabis smoke contains many of the same cancer causing substances (carcinogens) as tobacco - at least 50 of them. In addition, cannabis is often mixed with tobacco when smoked.
One of these carcinogens is benzyprene. Benzyprene is in the tar of both tobacco and cannabis cigarettes. We know that benzyprene causes cancer. It alters a gene called p53, which is a tumour suppressor gene. We know that 3 out of 4 lung cancers (75% ) occur in people who have faulty p53 genes. The p53 gene is also linked to many other cancers. ..."
Certainly not proven, it may or may not cause cancer, but science clearly implies it isn't 'absurd' but perfectly possible and any rational mind who has actually bothered to look up the evidence would think it is not only possible but just perhaps even 'probable' but, either way, certainly NOT 'absurd'; that, of course, excludes your mind.
We have already shown you ample science evidence for man made global warming which is considerably more substantial than any evidence for cannabis smoke causing cancer thus it is even more idiotic to dismiss man made global warming as 'absurd'.
Tell us;
if you were wrong about global warming, how would you expect the evidence to be different from what it is? I mean, what WOULD be evidence for man made global warming in your book? Or do you simply automatically dismiss all evidence that might conflict with your beliefs before you look at it?
-If you remain silent on this question, we all know why.