Originally posted by twhitehead
Yet you are physically incapable of reposting the pertinent data?
You have spent many many posts in this thread assuring everyone that if they do the research for themselves they will find out they are wrong. But never actually getting to demonstrating that that is so. And now its 'go back and read the relevant posts'. The information that supports yo ...[text shortened]... hat would be stupid. No, I am making fun of you, not debating you. Wake up and smell the coffee.
Yet you are physically incapable of reposting the pertinent data?
Incapable?
Try unwilling, instead.
If it’s already posted--- and it is--- instead of taking up more space repeating the same information, the only effort which should be expended is on your end to go back and read it again.
You have spent many many posts in this thread assuring everyone that if they do the research for themselves they will find out they are wrong. But never actually getting to demonstrating that that is so. And now its 'go back and read the relevant posts'. The information that supports your case is always somewhere else, to be found by someone else.
I can assure you of one thing: my only mission is to stay on topic and in doing so, I post the support for my position.
That’s how it’s supposed to work.
But the links don't back up your claims.
I kinda figured you’d have a problem understanding exactly you were being shown, so I took the extra step of quoting the pertinent information, eliminating the need for you to go to NASA’s website.
Didn’t help.
Which explains your silence and inability to back up your claims yourself?
Making a post
is speaking for myself.
I know full well what the point was. The problem is, your point is not backed up by the facts. Even worse, you finally recognized that it wasn't backed up by the facts, hence the recent hilarious post all about Fred, that didn't even mention the original point.
The facts are exactly as stated; Fred was in response to an auxiliary challenge by KZ.
Debate? With a flat earther? Now that would be stupid. No, I am making fun of you, not debating you. Wake up and smell the coffee.
Let’s define terms for you since you continue to struggle with the basics, mkay?
A debate is a discussion, as of a public question in an assembly, involving opposing viewpoints.
This is what you’ve been doing, albeit not very well.
As I have asserted for quite some time, people without support for their position will resort to focusing their efforts on denigrating the person instead of addressing the issues.
This you do when your deplorable debate skills are exposed, but--- as with your lack of prowess in the first category--- not very well.