02 Nov '13 11:09>
http://phys.org/news/2013-11-global-dwarfism-mammalstwice.html
Makes sense: assuming the body shape doesn't change all that much, the larger the warm-blooded body size, the less the body volume to surface area ratio and the lower the rate which it looses heat; good for cold climates but bad for hot climates. Thus, at least for warm blooded animals, natural selection would generally favour a smaller body size in hotter climates than in colder climates.
But I have just two criticisms of this link;
1, the link failed to explain the above explanation so that laypeople would understand why this evolutionary phenomenon should happen. I would guess that far from all laypeople would work that one out for themselves so I think that they should have mentioned it. The link even says "Interestingly, the extent of mammalian dwarfism may be related to the magnitude of the hyperthermal event," as if they were surprised by this observed evolutionary phenomenon! Surely they didn't fail to see the simple reason why that observed evolutionary phenomenon should happen!? If so, shame on them.
2, the link uses the scientifically obsolete Fahrenheit scale for temperature; That's pretty silly of them.
Makes sense: assuming the body shape doesn't change all that much, the larger the warm-blooded body size, the less the body volume to surface area ratio and the lower the rate which it looses heat; good for cold climates but bad for hot climates. Thus, at least for warm blooded animals, natural selection would generally favour a smaller body size in hotter climates than in colder climates.
But I have just two criticisms of this link;
1, the link failed to explain the above explanation so that laypeople would understand why this evolutionary phenomenon should happen. I would guess that far from all laypeople would work that one out for themselves so I think that they should have mentioned it. The link even says "Interestingly, the extent of mammalian dwarfism may be related to the magnitude of the hyperthermal event," as if they were surprised by this observed evolutionary phenomenon! Surely they didn't fail to see the simple reason why that observed evolutionary phenomenon should happen!? If so, shame on them.
2, the link uses the scientifically obsolete Fahrenheit scale for temperature; That's pretty silly of them.