1. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    29 Sep '11 18:18
    Originally posted by mikelom
    The Buddha said do not kill! (animals included)

    If an animal is not slain by a Buddhist, but is already dead, then to eat it is not killing. It is acceptable!
    So you pay someone else to kill it, and think you are not killing? Your morals need some examination.
  2. Standard memberDasa
    Dasa
    Account suspended
    Joined
    20 May '10
    Moves
    8042
    29 Sep '11 20:29
    Originally posted by mikelom
    The Buddha said do not kill! (animals included)

    If an animal is not slain by a Buddhist, but is already dead, then to eat it is not killing. It is acceptable!

    Get your facts right!

    For you to disdainfully say "any Buddhist who eats meat is not a Buddhist" is unquantified, and completely misunderstood.

    There are five principal rules. If one can me ...[text shortened]... again, and come back to me with some, at least, incremental understanding of Buddhism.

    -m.
    Eating meat puts demand on the killing machine the slaughter house - so if one eats meat they are implicated in the animal killed.

    No meat eating.

    No demand.

    No slaughter houses.

    Once again....any Buddhist who eats meat is not a Buddhist.
  3. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    The Axe man
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    102612
    29 Sep '11 21:19
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    So you pay someone else to kill it, and think you are not killing? Your morals need some examination.
    A buddhist should worry about the happiness of all beings, the guy at the abbottoir and the cows included.
  4. Wat?
    Joined
    16 Aug '05
    Moves
    76863
    30 Sep '11 01:31
    Originally posted by karoly aczel
    A buddhist should worry about the happiness of all beings, the guy at the abbottoir and the cows included.
    A Buddhist should? What? Are we special? 😕
  5. Wat?
    Joined
    16 Aug '05
    Moves
    76863
    30 Sep '11 01:321 edit
    Originally posted by Dasa
    Once again....any Buddhist who eats meat is not a Buddhist.
    😀 😀 You are so funny! 😀 😀

    Edit: I see Chicken Biryani is a specialist common dish of your country!
    Any words on that one?

    And for the Christians... what was it about 5 loaves and 2 fish(es) I forgot? Did Jesus magically create 2 dead fish?

    Look at your own pastures before you try to morally put down mine! 😛 😀

    -m.
  6. Standard memberkaroly aczel
    The Axe man
    Brisbane,QLD
    Joined
    11 Apr '09
    Moves
    102612
    30 Sep '11 01:37
    Originally posted by mikelom
    A Buddhist should? What? Are we special? 😕
    I stand corrected.
  7. Wat?
    Joined
    16 Aug '05
    Moves
    76863
    30 Sep '11 03:05
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    So you pay someone else to kill it, and think you are not killing? Your morals need some examination.
    Who said anything about me paying? ? ?

    I think your train of thought needs examination, if you think I wrote such nonsense. 😛
  8. Joined
    28 Oct '05
    Moves
    34587
    30 Sep '11 03:50
    Originally posted by Dasa
    Once again....any Buddhist who eats meat is not a Buddhist.
    Dasa, you are using the word "not" incorrectly.
  9. Wat?
    Joined
    16 Aug '05
    Moves
    76863
    30 Sep '11 04:541 edit
    Originally posted by FMF
    Dasa, you are using the word "not" incorrectly.
    😀

    Now that's witty!
  10. Joined
    18 Jan '07
    Moves
    12352
    30 Sep '11 15:40
    Originally posted by mikelom
    I think your train of thought needs examination, if you think I wrote such nonsense. 😛
    I think your train of thought needs examination, if you think a train of thought was involved in anything Dasa wrote.

    Richard
  11. Wat?
    Joined
    16 Aug '05
    Moves
    76863
    30 Sep '11 15:57
    Originally posted by Shallow Blue
    I think your train of thought needs examination, if you think a train of thought was involved in anything Dasa wrote.

    Richard
    If you check the records my response about examination was to twhitehead, as he questioned me as a Buddhist to examine myself as if I personally kill animals, not to Dasa. 😉

    Trains of thought with Dasa only exist in a world of self-delusion, psychotic indoctination, and complete foolishness. Those latter three being highly conclusive in his/her/its knowledge of REAL proven science. (I can't identify the 3rd person singular it relates itself to 😳)

    -m.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree