I have lost about 15 kgs over the last 10 months or so. I put this down to resuming a food combining diet where, as you will probably know, protein is eaten at different mealtimes from carbohydrates and both are eaten with foods that fall into a broad 'neutral' category.
Has anyone else tried it?
Do you any of you people of the scientific persuasion have any thoughts on this kind of diet?
Originally posted by FMFI have not heard of that idea before.
I put this down to resuming a food combining diet where, as you will probably know, protein is eaten at different mealtimes from carbohydrates and both are eaten with foods that fall into a broad 'neutral' category.
As a first guess, the weight loss probably has to do with the fact that you are being careful what you eat and thus probably eat healthier foods. In addition - and possibly more important, the order in which you eat and the combinations may result in you consuming less or more healthily.
I find sugar (or energy foods in general) to be addictive. If you consume some sugar, you want more. Some other foods like proteins do not have such a strong effect.
I find that if I avoid foods that I know have an addictive effect on me then I can keep my weight down.
Originally posted by twhiteheadI find sugar (or energy foods in general) to be addictive.
I have not heard of that idea before.
As a first guess, the weight loss probably has to do with the fact that you are being careful what you eat and thus probably eat healthier foods. In addition - and possibly more important, the order in which you eat and the combinations may result in you consuming less or more healthily.
I find sugar (or energy fo ...[text shortened]... that if I avoid foods that I know have an addictive effect on me then I can keep my weight down.
They are addictive, and so are carbohydrates. Our bodies don't like too many carbohydrates.
A great blog on insulin, blood sugar and type II diabetes that everyone (on the planet) should read.
http://www.marksdailyapple.com/diabetes/
Originally posted by twhiteheadNo. It's about the process of digestion being more or less efficient in its conversion of food into energy/fat/waste etc. The stomach does not digest a mixture of protein and carbohydrates as 'well' as it does one or the other on its own. Another 'rule' is not drinking water at the same time as eating a meal, for the same reason. During the last ten months I have been eating as much as I want and I have been making no effort to select "healthier" foods than I ate in the previous 10 months.
As a first guess, the weight loss probably has to do with the fact that you are being careful what you eat and thus probably eat healthier foods.
Originally posted by FMFSurely the aim is for the stomach to digest the food less well? Or is that what you meant by 'well'?
No. It's about the process of digestion being more or less efficient in its conversion of food into energy/fat/waste etc. The stomach does not digest a mixture of protein and carbohydrates as 'well' as it does one or the other on its own. Another 'rule' is not drinking water at the same time as eating a meal, for the same reason. During the last ten months I hav ...[text shortened]... e been making no effort to select "healthier" foods than I ate in the previous 10 months.
What you don't say, is whether or not your actual diet did change or whether or not you do now eat less.
If you do want to loose more weight then I suggest you do consider eating healthier foods.
Originally posted by FMFI find TWhiteheads answer more compelling. Do we have any independant research saying that digestion of mixed food types is worse than that of individual food types on their own? Or is this justification purely from the proponents of the diet your are following? What evidence do they cite?
No. It's about the process of digestion being more or less efficient in its conversion of food into energy/fat/waste etc. The stomach does not digest a mixture of protein and carbohydrates as 'well' as it does one or the other on its own. Another 'rule' is not drinking water at the same time as eating a meal, for the same reason. During the last ten months I hav ...[text shortened]... e been making no effort to select "healthier" foods than I ate in the previous 10 months.
From our old favourite, Wikipedia:
The food-combining diet has been the subject of one peer-reviewed randomized clinical trial, which found no benefit from the diet in terms of weight loss.
Here's the abstract from that study (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10805507):
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of two diets ('food combining' or dissociated vs balanced) on body weight and metabolic parameters during a 6-week period in an in-hospital setting.
SUBJECTS AND DESIGN: 54 obese patients were randomly assigned to receive diets containing 4.5 MJ/day (1100 kcal/day) composed of either 25% protein, 47% carbohydrates and 25% lipids (dissociated diet) or 25% protein, 42% carbohydrates and 31% lipids (balanced diet). Consequently, the two diets were equally low in energy and substrate content (protein, fat and carbohydrate) but widely differed in substrate distribution throughout the day.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the amount of weight loss in response to dissociated (6.2 +/- 0.6 kg) or balanced (7.5 +/- 0.4 kg) diets. Furthermore, significant decreases in total body fat and waist-to-hip circumference ratio were seen in both groups, and the magnitude of the changes did not vary as a function of the diet composition. Fasting plasma glucose, insulin, total cholesterol and triacylglycerol concentrations decreased significantly and similarly in patients receiving both diets. Both systolic and diastolic blood pressure values decreased significantly in patients eating balanced diets. The results of this study show that both diets achieved similar weight loss. Total fat weight loss was higher in balanced diets, although differences did not reach statistical significance. Total lean body mass was identically spared in both groups.
CONCLUSION: In summary at identical energy intake and similar substrate composition, the dissociated (or 'food combining'😉 diet did not bring any additional loss in weight and body fat.
So it compared compared two different diets but did not compare against no diet at all. It was randomised but not double-blind (hard to see how you could double-blind this) but even with these caveats, it found no evidence that your diet is intrinsically better or worse than a normal balanced diet.
Having said that, if you are losing weight through it and have no adverse side effects, keep going. It sounds a damn site better than many other diets. I would be interested to hear what happens when/if you come off it.
--- Penguin
1 edit
It is my belief that our weight gain or loss is largely about what we eat in total. It is also my belief that the main battle is a psychological one.
It is also the case that what we eat and how we eat it has a significant effect on how easy it is psychologically to maintain a healthy diet.
I believe exercise is good for the health, but that it does not in itself burn off nearly as much fat as we are led to believe. It also affects our eating habits which may benefit or harm us depending on the effect it has.
Originally posted by PenguinThe "no benefit from the diet in terms of weight loss" thing is interesting. I followed the Hay Diet in 1989 for a few months when I faced a very busy cricketing summer. Then in 1993 for a few months before my wedding. And during the last 10-12 months. The weight loss has been marked and undeniable in each case. I have lost 2 stone in a year without counting calories or going hungry. Here in Indonesia I pretty much eat exactly the same food, and in the same amounts, as I did before - but I simply keep the two food groups separate.
The food-combining diet has been the subject of one peer-reviewed randomized clinical trial, which found no benefit from the diet in terms of weight loss.
Originally posted by FMFStudies have also shown that placebo pills can work as diet pills if people believe they work. It appears your appetite can be reduced simply by being on a dieting mindset.
The "no benefit from the diet in terms of weight loss" thing is interesting. I followed the Hay Diet in 1989 for a few months when I faced a very busy cricketing summer. Then in 1993 for a few months before my wedding. And during the last 10-12 months. The weight loss has been marked and undeniable in each case. I have lost 2 stone in a year without counting cal ...[text shortened]... od, and in the same amounts, as I did before - but I simply keep the two food groups separate.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraAs I explained, I haven't reduced the amount of food I eat. And I haven't changed what I eat. My appetite is the same as it ever was.
Studies have also shown that placebo pills can work as diet pills if people believe they work. It appears your appetite can be reduced simply by being on a dieting mindset.
Originally posted by KazetNagorraAs I say, I eat pretty much the same stuff and just as much of it. I would estimate that the calorie intake has not changed. My amount of exercise has not really changed either. I don't really buy the placebo effect idea; not for the steady loss of 33 lbs. I can only really put the loss of weight to the different permutation of my food. Apparently almost no research has been done into it (according to Penguin's post) so it seems to be a bit of an unknown area.
Perhaps you have, but you simply have not noticed it.