Originally posted by FMF
Perhaps because the types of food are digested more efficiently if they are digested separately? i.e. more is extracted from eating less, explaining why I never get hungry and why I am able eat as much as I feel I want, which cannot be said for a calorie-counting approach (in my case).
In my experience, some foods make you want to eat more, and some foods leave you satisfied. I believe the foods that make you want to eat more, are the ones that give you an energy rush. This includes foods with high sugar content (immediate rush) or those high in carbohydrates (delayed rush). Proteins generally do not give a rush.
So, if you separate your foods, then for your protein meal, you have no rush and eat less. If you mix your foods you get a rush at each meal and eat more. The order of you meals may also have a lot to do with it. If you have the proteins earlier in the day and the sugars and carbohydrates late in the day then much of the day you will not feel hungry.
I got most of the above ideas from reading about the Atkins diet a few years ago and the concepts there made sense then and I have been observing the effects closely ever since and I think it hits the nail on the head.
So my advice: avoid carbohydrates and sugars for breakfast and keep them to a minimum at lunch. You could also go for slow release carbohydrates for lunch such as what is called "Low GI" bread here in SA (I don't know if it exists elsewhere).
Also, if you notice a particular food that makes you hungry or foods that are addictive (soft drinks, chocolate etc) then stop taking them altogether.
With addictions the best solution is always total avoidance. Too many people try to keep the quantities low but then have trouble dealing with the cravings (and give in to them). If you allow yourself one bar of chocolate a week, you will soon be having more than that (or will struggle not to). If you totally stop having any, the cravings go away.