Originally posted by KazetNagorra
"Macro" evolution is what you get after a prolonged period of "micro" evolution.
Although we've never actually seen macro evolution take place as a result of micro evolution.
The question for this discussion is what is proof? Is it that we can make predictions about what we find in the fossil record? Is it that we can reproduce what actually happened?
If we are talking about making prediction based on certain assumptions and those prediction work, then you are simply making a basis for belief on the certain assumptions.
Of course this does not negate creation. I believe that the Roman Catholic church teaches that God created the universe through evolution.
To tell you the truth, I think that macro evolution as a result of natural micro evolutions is simply a religious belief rooted in those who ascribe to the religion that says we must reject God as an explanation. If we must exclude God, then God is automatically rejected and the only reason why we reject God is because we believe it is what we must believe. Why must we believe that, it is because we must. It is a circle based on itself which is nothing more than a religious belief.