@metal-brain said
Global warming is a political issue. Every democrat that got into the debates says global warming is a problem, some even said it was the biggest problem. There was not one exception that I noticed.
You cannot honestly say climate scientists are not biased because of political leanings. Every person debating me on this issue is a leftist including yourself. That is not a ...[text shortened]... faith and nothing else. No matter how wrong alarmist get it they are still right in their own minds.
Just typing "Al Gore" is not an argument.
Expropriation of wealth? Switching to recycled nuclear power would be cheaper, the fuel is free. The impediment is not monetary. Instead, it is fear-mongering articles about the 'deaths' of 1 million people that never happened.
Since we are back-and-forth here about widely-accepted facts related to physics and chemistry of atmospheric gases, then what about all the the other reasons to switch from coal? We can keep our mountains. No one needs to die of black lung anymore. There will be cleaner air. A lower utility bill. Recycling our nuclear waste.
Expropriation of wealth? My taxes fund our current land use policy that consists of giving $867 billion in subsidies to wealthy farmers, many of whom already turn profits. For those who don't, I hear them complain that they wouldn't make money without subsidies? Well...... maybe time to grow another crop or find a new profession instead of expropriating my wealth? We can't think of a better use for $867 billion? They're buying votes in Iowa.
Re prioritizing our climate ahead of our current system that provides subsidies for failing, polluting, carbon-emitting industries is not going to cost Joe Taxpayer anything.