17 Feb '21 23:25>
https://theconversation.com/amp/we-sequenced-the-oldest-ever-dna-from-million-year-old-mammoths-155485
@wildgrass saidIs it possible to inject the DNA into an elephant embryo and bring the species back to life?
https://theconversation.com/amp/we-sequenced-the-oldest-ever-dna-from-million-year-old-mammoths-155485
@phil-a-dork saidNot if it is a full sequence of DNA and RNA. It would be a mammoth from a surrogate elephant mother. The elephant DNA would be removed from an embryo and replaced with the mammoth DNA.
It would be half mammoth and half elephant.
...right?
@phil-a-dork saidThere were no glaciers to preserve dinosaurs back that far. Cool to think about, but Jurassic Park is unlikely to happen.
Interesting 🤔
I think they should experiment and try to bring back those animals of long ago.
Dinosaurs too 😉
@metal-brain saidThat's an interesting thought, although I don't think it's possible.
Is it possible to inject the DNA into an elephant embryo and bring the species back to life?
@wildgrass saidYes, and nearly all experts on this say it is SO much so that the genetic information has simply been lost thus it cannot be recovered no matter HOW advanced the genetic analysis technology!
The DNA is undoubtedly fragmented.
@humy saidIn this case, though, we were able to get sequence data. It seems conceivable that an alignment with elephant DNA, and using elephant DNA as an initial template, this would be possible to do with the million year old mammoth.
Yes, and nearly all experts on this say it is SO much so that the genetic information has simply been lost thus it cannot be recovered no matter HOW advanced the genetic analysis technology!
see;
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2013/09/14/scientists-demonstrate-that-jurassic-park-couldnt-happen/?sh=248cf4632f7e
"...
There are quite a few things about the movie Jurass ...[text shortened]... so on."
So its clearly completely impossible for any dino DNA to have survived to the modern day.
@wildgrass saidArr, sorry; Failed to notice there you were actually talking about mammoth dna and not dino dna. That's kind-of what I get from trying to read way too fast skimming over the odd word.
In this case, though, we were able to get sequence data.
@humy saidI have re-read those links and reconsidered and now think it might be possible for readable dino dna to have survived after all!
Yes, and nearly all experts on this say it is SO much so that the genetic information has simply been lost thus it cannot be recovered no matter HOW advanced the genetic analysis technology!
see;
https://www.forbes.com/sites/alexknapp/2013/09/14/scientists-demonstrate-that-jurassic-park-couldnt-happen/?sh=248cf4632f7e
"...
There are quite a few things about the movie Jurass ...[text shortened]... so on."
So its clearly completely impossible for any dino DNA to have survived to the modern day.
@wildgrass saidIf the DNA is undoubtedly fragmented how would they know they have the right DNA? I think this is an over rated and overly hyped story.
That's an interesting thought, although I don't think it's possible.
The DNA is undoubtedly fragmented. They can sequence the pieces of DNA with short reads but it would not "function" as DNA in a living organism. I suppose they could do a version of the Jurassic Park thing, and compare the sequence to an intact elephant DNA sequence and edit in the corresponding changes, but that's an enormous undertaking.
If the DNA was intact it would absolutely be possible.
@metal-brain saidThis is what happens when you comment about something you assume you know all about but don't; You just embarrass yourself by showing how arrogantly ignorant you are.
If the DNA is undoubtedly fragmented how would they know they have the right DNA?
I think this is an over rated and overly hyped story.No, it isn't just a "story", idiot! It is "science". Stop assuming you know better than the experts; YOU DON'T! I don't so you CERTAINLY don't!