24 Nov '11 22:25>
William Gilbert I would say.Considered by many including Galileo to be the pioneer,especially regarding Magnetto.
Originally posted by lourdianThanks I didn't know that and that he pointed out that the motion of the skies was due to earth's rotation, 20 years before Galileo.
William Gilbert I would say.Considered by many including Galileo to be the pioneer,especially regarding Magnetto.
Originally posted by amolv06Newton himself said
[b]Long version: I got into a friendly argument with a fellow student the other day about who the most influential scientist of all time was. My thought was Isaac Newton. He said Michael Faraday. We debated this for around an hour, went off on many tangents, and learned a few things I think. This process was interesting enough that I would like to co ...[text shortened]... time is, considering only his/her contribution to science, and not necessarily society at large?[/b]
Originally posted by wolfgang59We should be thankful for all the smalls: http://www.amazon.com/Peoples-History-Science-Midwives-Mechanicks/dp/1560257482
Ultimately society would develop (but more slowly) without any individual but we should be thankful for all the Greats.
Originally posted by adam warlockYes. The Dark Ages most certainly were not for the Muslim world!
We should be thankful for all the smalls: http://www.amazon.com/Peoples-History-Science-Midwives-Mechanicks/dp/1560257482
Not directed at you but at this thread in general: don't you forget all the advances that happened in the muslim world in the 10th, 11th, 12th century that precedes most of what you're lauding here by quite some time (I'd recommend Alhazen as great scientist).
Originally posted by wolfgang59In fact, the Dark Ages were at worst twilight for Europe outside of Great Britain. Ever heard of the Carolingian Renaissance? It didn't happen in London, of course, so it didn't happen at all in the minds of most English history publicists... but to the rest of us, it did. The letters you're reading right now are mostly based on work done by the Carolingians. Dark, indeed - so Dark they gave us illumination!
Yes. The Dark Ages most certainly were not for the Muslim world!
Originally posted by Shallow BlueI was actually reading an article about the Carolingian Renaissance a few weeks ago - I had never heard the term before though of course Charlemagne is well known.
In fact, the Dark Ages were at worst twilight for Europe outside of Great Britain. Ever heard of the Carolingian Renaissance? It didn't happen in London, of course, so it didn't happen at all in the minds of most English history publicists... but to the rest of us, it did. The letters you're reading right now are mostly based on work done by the Carolingians. Dark, indeed - so Dark they gave us illumination!
Richard
Originally posted by wolfgang59Edison was on the wrong side of the "War of the Currents".
Newton himself said
“If I have seen further than others, it is by standing upon the shoulders of giants.”
... and he was NOT a modest man!
Whose shoulders? Probably he was thinking of Galileo & Aristotle & ...
-
I think Edison is probably overlooked because he was commercially successful but his influence is substantial.
=
Ultimately society would develop (but more slowly) without any individual but we should be thankful for all the Greats.
Originally posted by Metal BrainThen again, Edison got the job done, while Tesla floated some genius ideas but also some cloud castles. In the practical world of commerce, this gives Edison the edge, whether scientists and geeks like me like it or not.
Tesla was probably the greatest inventor in world history and was very benevolent. Edison was just a selfish cad who used others.
Originally posted by Shallow BlueHe didn't invent the light bulb?
Then again, Edison got the job done, while Tesla floated some genius ideas but also some cloud castles. In the practical world of commerce, this gives Edison the edge, whether scientists and geeks like me like it or not.
But in the end, Edison only ever invented two things: the phonograph, and patent fraud.
Richard