1 edit
Originally posted by NordlysRead the link he provided, the first few paragraphs, read the first two pages in the thread and didn't want more of it. That's just silly. Not even crackpot material, just silly.
Thread 39009
Enjoy! 😀
ðŸ˜
Originally posted by adam warlockThat explains his lack of understanding what a real source is.
Read the link he provided, the first few paragraphs, read the first two pages in the thread and didn't want more of it. That's just silly. Not even crackpot material, just silly.
ðŸ˜
Arrakis, get this book:
"Asking the Right Questions : A guide to critical thinking" 5th Edition, by Browne and Keeley.
Excellent book, I think it'll really help you.
It also has diagrams, which might be a help.
Originally posted by NordlysI rather like that thread. 🙂
Thread 39009
Enjoy! 😀
But you should understand, my dear, your desperate attempt to flame me not only has nothing to do with the topic in this post, but it will also backfire on you.
May you have many children. 😉
Originally posted by ArrakisBut YOU are the one who still thinks 911 was planned by Bush.
I rather like that thread. 🙂
But you should understand, my dear, your desperate attempt to flame me not only has nothing to do with the topic in this post, but it will also backfire on you.
May you have many children. 😉
Originally posted by ArrakisHowsbout some cheese to go with that whine? This isn't science - this is about as scientific as Intelligent Design and consists solely of ginned-up speculative rantings by some messianic whackjob who can't function in the real world. You just run along and go tell on me now, but why someone would entertain your rantings is beyond me. You don't have 'rights' here; no one does. So if you have the 'right' to post it I have the 'right' to tell you that if you actually believe this - nonsense - then you've self-identified as a person without the slightest bit of judgment.
Your opinion is highly regarded. My point is that people should be able to post new scientific ideas in this thread, Some members may like or dislike the content and I have no problem with that. What I have a problem with is a forum moderator who determines what our members should be able to read or not read and moves my threads to the "Spirituality forum".
Cheers,
Arrakis
Originally posted by sasquatch672But other than that, its a good thread?
Howsbout some cheese to go with that whine? This isn't science - this is about as scientific as Intelligent Design and consists solely of ginned-up speculative rantings by some messianic whackjob who can't function in the real world. You just run along and go tell on me now, but why someone would entertain your rantings is beyond me. You don't have ' ...[text shortened]... sense - then you've self-identified as a person without the slightest bit of judgment.
Originally posted by ArrakisAs many have already pointed out, this is absolute nonsense. There are youtube links about "scientific proof" of the existence of aliens, ghosts and other such nonsense. I don't see how this fits in the science forum.
Surviving 2012 and Planet X - Part 1 of 5: The Threat
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8S0bj76389U
Surviving 2012 and Planet X - Part 2 of 5: Scientific Proof
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sjjrStDxTrc&NR=1
Surviving 2012 and Planet X - Part 4 of 5: Surviving
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HNZIyfBChmA&NR=1
Surviving 2012 and Planet X - Part 5 o ...[text shortened]... ecorded and sent to Russ & Chris, whom I am in personal dialog regarding this matter.
Arrakis
Regarding your "note": For someone who called a member of this site a "dyke" you have some cheek, you homophobe git.
Originally posted by PalynkaI'd argue as a demonstration of what DOES NOT count as evidence, it is valuable. How else will people learn?
As many have already pointed out, this is absolute nonsense. There are youtube links about "scientific proof" of the existence of aliens, ghosts and other such nonsense. I don't see how this fits in the science forum.
Regarding your "note": For someone who called a member of this site a "dyke" you have some cheek, you homophobe git.
1 edit
Another Thread 89438 is opened of the same topic.
It sure is an interesting thing to discuss among religous people.