Normal Weight Obesity

Originally posted by C Hess
Liberal is a religious stance? You make less sense to me with every post you
write. Do you even understand yourself what you're writing, or are you just
hitting the keyboard at random, hoping for success? 🙄

No, liberal is not a religious stance. The belief that God does not exist and only natural explanations are possible is a religious stance.

Originally posted by Eladar
No, liberal is not a religious stance. The belief that God does not exist and only natural explanations are possible is a religious stance.

😵

LOL, you're awesome. Never stop posting here please, you always bring a smile to my face!

😀

Originally posted by Eladar
Wow! Is that what you read? Where did I ever say that?

I take it you aren't too bright either. Of course you might be bright, but simply immature. If you are 12, that would explain your response. Same thing goes for humy.

But you are a bit of a fatty, aren't you? Over 100 kg? Moderate hight? Come on, be honest now!

Originally posted by Eladar
No, liberal is not a religious stance. The belief that God does not exist and only natural explanations are possible is a religious stance.

{throwing dictionary in the bin}

Originally posted by Eladar
No, liberal is not a religious stance. The belief that God does not exist and only natural explanations are possible is a religious stance.

No, that is an anti-religious stance by definition.
By definition, a "religious" stance would be a belief ( and claim I presume ) that one of the religions, which, by definition of "religion", requires belief that there is a supernatural, is true ( although, depending on the religion, usually but not necessarily also a belief that there is a god. Also, obviously, it is possible to believe that there exists a supernatural without believing one of the religions )

If you don't believe nor claim there is a god nor that there is a supernatural, by definition, you don't have a religious stance.

Originally posted by C Hess
{throwing dictionary in the bin}

😉

Dictionaries are controlled by the liberal, god-hating, sinful, progressive hippies anyway.

Originally posted by humy
No, that is an anti-religious stance by definition.
By definition, a "religious" stance would be a belief ( and claim I presume ) that one of the religions, which by definition of "religion" requires belief that there is a supernatural although, depending on the religion, usually but not necessarily a belief that there is a god, is true ( although, obviously, ...[text shortened]... ere is a god nor that there is a supernatural, by definition, you don't have a religious stance.

{wiping the goo off the dictionary}

Originally posted by Great King Rat
😉

Dictionaries are controlled by the liberal, god-hating, sinful, progressive hippies anyway.

yes, and so are all science text books and all science research and scientific studies.

Originally posted by Great King Rat
😵

LOL, you're awesome. Never stop posting here please, you always bring a smile to my face!

😀

That's because you aren't really understanding what I'm saying.

Originally posted by C Hess
{wiping off the goo from the dictionary}

I take it this goo would be the sticky mess of moronic religious nut rhetoric.

Originally posted by Eladar
That's because you aren't really understanding what I'm saying.

No, it's because he does.

Originally posted by Eladar
That's because you aren't really understanding what I'm saying.

Alright, enlighten me, oh great sage. What did you mean what you said:

I found this part interesting too

When Elizabeth Chanatry was 16 years old, she was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. You’d never know it by looking at the 5-foot-3-inch tall, 117-pound 19-year-old, but even Chanatry admits that she’s not as fit as she could be. “My sister and I are not toned, but we are thin,” she says.

I guess just being thin isn't good enough.

Originally posted by humy
yes, and so are all science text books and all science research and scientific studies.

Yup. It's the government led by Obama, you know. They understand that by convincing us to be thin we'll be too weak to stand up to them one day. And that's when they'll begin their diabolical plan of a new world order, with Satan as the prime overlord.

Little do they realise there are preppers like Eladar all over America gaining massive amounts of weight ready to stand up (with great difficulty) and fight the good fight.

Originally posted by humy
No, that is an anti-religious stance by definition.
By definition, a "religious" stance would be a belief ( and claim I presume ) that one of the religions, which, by definition of "religion", requires belief that there is a supernatural, is true ( although, depending on the religion, usually but not necessarily also a belief that there is a god. Also, obvious ...[text shortened]... ere is a god nor that there is a supernatural, by definition, you don't have a religious stance.

Yes, I know that's what your religious beliefs lead you to believe.

Originally posted by Great King Rat
Yup. It's the government led by Obama, you know. They understand that by convincing us to be thin we'll be too weak to stand up to them one day. And that's when they'll begin their diabolical plan of a new world order, with Satan as the prime overlord.

Little do they realise there are preppers like Eladar all over America gaining massive amounts of weight ready to stand up (with great difficulty) and fight the good fight.

I've always been on the larger side, I was a scholarship football player in college. It's my natural body type to be large and strong.