Originally posted by Metal BrainSo weather, not climate, can cause droughts? Is that your idiotic 'logic'?
Droughts are nothing new. They are caused by weather. ...
Why are the two mutually exclusive? Why can't weather cause droughts and a change in climate cause an increase in incidence of drought? Where is the contradiction with that? What a moron you are.
Originally posted by humyLack of knowledge...
So weather, not climate, can cause droughts? Is that your idiotic 'logic'?
Why are the two mutually exclusive? Why can't weather cause droughts and a change in climate cause an increase in incidence of drought? Where is the contradiction with that? What a moron you are.
Originally posted by humyNo, weather, not climate change IS causing the drought in California. You are using the word "can" in place of "is".
So weather, not climate, can cause droughts? Is that your idiotic 'logic'?
Why are the two mutually exclusive? Why can't weather cause droughts and a change in climate cause an increase in incidence of drought? Where is the contradiction with that? What a moron you are.
Nice attempt to move the goal post, but you have failed again.
Originally posted by Metal BrainThen you tell us idiots what is causing the 'weather' change. I'm sure you have a Singer video ready for that.
No, weather, not climate change IS causing the drought in California. You are using the word "can" in place of "is".
Nice attempt to move the goal post, but you have failed again.
Originally posted by sonhouseWeather has been changing for a very long time. This is nothing new. There is little need to explain it, but I did point out many times before that a warmer climate leads to more rainfall, not less. A modest study of the Pliocene is all you need to conclude that, but there are other observations of past climate changes that demonstrate this within 20,000 years.
Then you tell us idiots what is causing the 'weather' change. I'm sure you have a Singer video ready for that.
http://theinconvenientskeptic.com/2014/05/africa-drought-and-global-temperature/
I am also posting this article about Ivar Giaever, a scientist who shared the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physics. He challenged those who say that climate change has resulted in “extreme weather,” which he dismissed as an effort to “scare people,” and the contention that sea levels are rising unusually quickly, saying that, “There is no unusual rise in sea level.”
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/7/nobel-physicist-obama-dead-wrong-global-warming/?page=all
Giaever is right. It doesn't take much study to see that either.
2 edits
Originally posted by Metal BrainYou mean THIS Giaever?
Weather has been changing for a very long time. This is nothing new. There is little need to explain it, but I did point out many times before that a warmer climate leads to more rainfall, not less. A modest study of the Pliocene is all you need to conclude that, but there are other observations of past climate changes that demonstrate this within 20,000 ...[text shortened]... ong-global-warming/?page=all
Giaever is right. It doesn't take much study to see that either.
http://www.skepticalscience.com/ivar-giaever-nobel-physicist-climate-pseudoscientist.html
So you figure a nobel prize on Josephson junctions makes him an expert on climate?
BTW, do you even know what a Josephson junction is?
Or electron tunneling?
Originally posted by sonhouseIf skeptical science says he is a wacko it must be true. 🙄
You mean THIS Giaever?
http://www.skepticalscience.com/ivar-giaever-nobel-physicist-climate-pseudoscientist.html
So you figure a nobel prize on Josephson junctions makes him an expert on climate?
BTW, do you even know what a Josephson junction is?
Or electron tunneling?
Did you check rense.com to see if he believes the moon is hollow? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Funny how Fred Singer being a climate scientist was not enough. Now a nobel prize winning physicist is crazy too.
Conclusion: Anybody who disagrees with your fringe alarmist views is crazy. James Hansen is the only sane person even though he never explains his predictions for stunning sea level rise.
Somebody show James Hansen the sea level graph that any idiot can see is normal and no reason for concern.
Originally posted by Metal BrainThe point is to not get into a prolonged pissing contest about all this. What will you do in the event you are proven wrong?
If skeptical science says he is a wacko it must be true. 🙄
Did you check rense.com to see if he believes the moon is hollow? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Funny how Fred Singer being a climate scientist was not enough. Now a nobel prize winning physicist is crazy too.
Conclusion: Anybody who disagrees with your fringe alarmist views is crazy. James Hans ...[text shortened]... how James Hansen the sea level graph that any idiot can see is normal and no reason for concern.