1. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    26 Jul '15 05:52
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    Droughts are nothing new. They are caused by weather. ...
    So weather, not climate, can cause droughts? Is that your idiotic 'logic'?
    Why are the two mutually exclusive? Why can't weather cause droughts and a change in climate cause an increase in incidence of drought? Where is the contradiction with that? What a moron you are.
  2. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    26 Jul '15 08:53
    Originally posted by humy
    So weather, not climate, can cause droughts? Is that your idiotic 'logic'?
    Why are the two mutually exclusive? Why can't weather cause droughts and a change in climate cause an increase in incidence of drought? Where is the contradiction with that? What a moron you are.
    Lack of knowledge...
  3. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    26 Jul '15 11:39
    Originally posted by humy
    So weather, not climate, can cause droughts? Is that your idiotic 'logic'?
    Why are the two mutually exclusive? Why can't weather cause droughts and a change in climate cause an increase in incidence of drought? Where is the contradiction with that? What a moron you are.
    No, weather, not climate change IS causing the drought in California. You are using the word "can" in place of "is".

    Nice attempt to move the goal post, but you have failed again.
  4. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    26 Jul '15 12:50
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    No, weather, not climate change IS causing the drought in California. You are using the word "can" in place of "is".

    Nice attempt to move the goal post, but you have failed again.
    Then you tell us idiots what is causing the 'weather' change. I'm sure you have a Singer video ready for that.
  5. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    26 Jul '15 14:37
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Then you tell us idiots what is causing the 'weather' change. I'm sure you have a Singer video ready for that.
    Weather has been changing for a very long time. This is nothing new. There is little need to explain it, but I did point out many times before that a warmer climate leads to more rainfall, not less. A modest study of the Pliocene is all you need to conclude that, but there are other observations of past climate changes that demonstrate this within 20,000 years.

    http://theinconvenientskeptic.com/2014/05/africa-drought-and-global-temperature/

    I am also posting this article about Ivar Giaever, a scientist who shared the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physics. He challenged those who say that climate change has resulted in “extreme weather,” which he dismissed as an effort to “scare people,” and the contention that sea levels are rising unusually quickly, saying that, “There is no unusual rise in sea level.”

    http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/jul/7/nobel-physicist-obama-dead-wrong-global-warming/?page=all

    Giaever is right. It doesn't take much study to see that either.
  6. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    26 Jul '15 15:162 edits
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    Weather has been changing for a very long time. This is nothing new. There is little need to explain it, but I did point out many times before that a warmer climate leads to more rainfall, not less. A modest study of the Pliocene is all you need to conclude that, but there are other observations of past climate changes that demonstrate this within 20,000 ...[text shortened]... ong-global-warming/?page=all

    Giaever is right. It doesn't take much study to see that either.
    You mean THIS Giaever?

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/ivar-giaever-nobel-physicist-climate-pseudoscientist.html

    So you figure a nobel prize on Josephson junctions makes him an expert on climate?

    BTW, do you even know what a Josephson junction is?
    Or electron tunneling?
  7. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    26 Jul '15 18:02
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    You mean THIS Giaever?

    http://www.skepticalscience.com/ivar-giaever-nobel-physicist-climate-pseudoscientist.html

    So you figure a nobel prize on Josephson junctions makes him an expert on climate?

    BTW, do you even know what a Josephson junction is?
    Or electron tunneling?
    If skeptical science says he is a wacko it must be true. 🙄

    Did you check rense.com to see if he believes the moon is hollow? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Funny how Fred Singer being a climate scientist was not enough. Now a nobel prize winning physicist is crazy too.

    Conclusion: Anybody who disagrees with your fringe alarmist views is crazy. James Hansen is the only sane person even though he never explains his predictions for stunning sea level rise.

    Somebody show James Hansen the sea level graph that any idiot can see is normal and no reason for concern.
  8. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    29 Jul '15 16:06
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    If skeptical science says he is a wacko it must be true. 🙄

    Did you check rense.com to see if he believes the moon is hollow? LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Funny how Fred Singer being a climate scientist was not enough. Now a nobel prize winning physicist is crazy too.

    Conclusion: Anybody who disagrees with your fringe alarmist views is crazy. James Hans ...[text shortened]... how James Hansen the sea level graph that any idiot can see is normal and no reason for concern.
    The point is to not get into a prolonged pissing contest about all this. What will you do in the event you are proven wrong?
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree