1. Standard memberapathist
    looking for loot
    western colorado
    Joined
    05 Feb '11
    Moves
    9664
    31 May '17 17:11
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    Your ignorance of science should not lead you to dictate to others that they are misrepresenting it.
    To be corrected on your mistake, in public, by your intellectual inferior! That must really sting.
  2. Account suspended
    Joined
    26 Dec '14
    Moves
    35596
    31 May '17 17:13
    Originally posted by apathist
    To be corrected on your mistake, in public, by your intellectual inferior! That must really sting.
    His giant ego will allow him to comfortably move on. 🙂
  3. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    31 May '17 17:231 edit
    Originally posted by apathist
    "Supernatural is just nature we don't understand yet."
    apathist
    We don't yet understand high temperature superconductivity -so high temperature superconductivity is "supernatural"? Rubbish!
  4. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    31 May '17 17:30
    Originally posted by apathist
    To be corrected on your mistake, in public, by your intellectual inferior! That must really sting.
    To be caught talking nonsense in public, by your intellectual superior, that must really sting.
  5. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    31 May '17 17:312 edits
    Originally posted by chaney3
    His giant ego will allow him to comfortably move on. 🙂
    Your giant propensity for lying and talking nonsense will allow you to say just about anything without shame. ( I suspect a few drinks helped you along )

    Just because people are obviously smarter than you, it does not follow that they have giant egos. That's just your own insecurity talking.
  6. Standard memberapathist
    looking for loot
    western colorado
    Joined
    05 Feb '11
    Moves
    9664
    31 May '17 17:32
    Originally posted by humy
    We don't yet understand high temperature superconductivity -so high temperature superconductivity is "supernatural"? Rubbish!
    Good point. In fairness though, I never said that anything currently unexplained should be considered supernatural.

    Maybe I should tweak my quote to match the pattern of the Clarke quote.

    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic"
    ~Clarke

    Any sufficiently mysterious natural event is indistinguishable from the supernatural

    or maybe

    Any sufficiently unknown natural event is indistinguishable from the supernatural
    ~apathist
  7. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    31 May '17 17:34
    Originally posted by apathist
    Any sufficiently unknown natural event is indistinguishable from the supernatural
    ~apathist
    Anything sufficiently unknown is unknown. Something of a tautology if you ask me.
    As for 'supernatural' I bet you cannot define it in a meaningful way.
  8. Standard memberapathist
    looking for loot
    western colorado
    Joined
    05 Feb '11
    Moves
    9664
    31 May '17 17:35
    All I'm saying, really, is that if there is an afterlife, or karma, or etc - they would be natural.
  9. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    31 May '17 17:351 edit
    Originally posted by apathist
    No simplistic bias there!
    No, none. They are essentially definitions. Your retort rather than counter argument suggests you know that full well.
  10. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    31 May '17 17:37
    Originally posted by apathist
    All I'm saying, really, is that if there is an afterlife, or karma, or etc - they would be natural.
    Which is why 'supernatural' is inherently incoherent.
  11. Standard memberapathist
    looking for loot
    western colorado
    Joined
    05 Feb '11
    Moves
    9664
    31 May '17 17:38
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    Anything sufficiently unknown is unknown. Something of a tautology if you ask me.
    As for 'supernatural' I bet you cannot define it in a meaningful way.
    supernatural: any natural event undetectable to current science.
  12. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    31 May '17 17:41
    Originally posted by Ghost of a Duke
    You've just highlighted my reluctance to use the word 'spiritual' to describe natural occurrences of 'sentience.'
    I too am reluctant to use it. But when a scientist talks of having a spiritual experience while looking at Jupiter through a telescope, I understand what they mean and do not automatically take it to be a religious experience. I would typically not describe it that way myself.
  13. Standard memberapathist
    looking for loot
    western colorado
    Joined
    05 Feb '11
    Moves
    9664
    31 May '17 17:42
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    No, none. They are essentially definitions.
    Atheism: a belief system that results in an eternity in Hell.

    Essentially a definition. Obviously biased, though, just like your definition for 'religion'.
  14. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    31 May '17 17:44
    Originally posted by apathist
    supernatural: any natural event undetectable to current science.
    So like the continents on the second planet around Alpha Centuri?
    Anyway, my challenge was not to just make up any definition as you could merely say:
    supernatural: grass that is a metre high.
    My challenge was to give a definition that meets common usage but remains coherent.
  15. Standard memberapathist
    looking for loot
    western colorado
    Joined
    05 Feb '11
    Moves
    9664
    31 May '17 17:45
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    Anything sufficiently unknown is unknown.
    Good! And for the Clarke quote:

    Anything really amazing is really amazing. Kinda tautological, Mr. Clarke.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree