@metal-brain said
https://www.globalresearch.ca/science-conclusive-masks-respirators-do-not-prevent-transmission-viruses/5718934
Dennis Rancourt eh. Now he's on about masks? A lot of what he says is accurate, but there is one logical leap I don't follow (maybe you can help me, Metal Brain?).
He writes in all BOLD that "
if anything gets through [the mask](and it always does, irrespective of the mask), then you are going to be infected. Masks cannot possibly work."
This statement seems to be premised on the idea that masks don't stop everything and only one droplet is enough to cause infection. While he admits that masks do stop droplets from getting into the air he uses this premise of 1 droplet and you're infected to discount all the important data on the stopping power of masks.
But, if you were allergic to bees, would you rather be in a room with 100 bees or only 10?
You are not infected by the presence of a viral droplet, you are infected when you come in contact with it and inhale that droplet. And the fact is you are less likely to inhale a droplet if there are fewer of them. Right?
Also, he ignores the dozens of epidemiological studies that show masks are effective at slowing the spread.
Also, what's his beef with the lamestream media? They're not the ones interpreting data or issuing public health recommendations. This seemed distracting in a supposedly scientific article.