@sonhouse saidAnyway, entanglement is a thing of particles in present time trapped in a quantum dance.
@ogb
Come back in about a thousand years, the answer ye or nay will probably be sussed out by then.
I don't know of any experiment where a particle from time A is entangled with another particle from time B, some future OR past timeframe.
If I am wrong, show me the data supporting that research.
BTW, I see you lost a game to natopigro (if I spelled that correctly, a 2300 player)
He tried to start a game with me not even saying hi with a one day time out period. I told him I don't play engines and the game strangely enough disappeared.
I don't think there is a single 2300 and up player who is NOT an engine.
Did you feel like it was engine play when you played him or her? Did he/she initiate the game and what was the time control?
- Joined
- 23 Jan 20
- Moves
- 2296
Let’s say time travel became possible eh?
What force would stop the human in the machine from returning to an unborn state?
If you could make the universe go back in time why would you assume the human running that machine wouldn’t go back also?
It’s a dumb idea/theory
And...
Time travel assumes that everything was recorded eh?
Nope.
The idea of time travel comes from light having to travel vast distances and yes you could see something in the past if you had a telescope but due to the vast distance you would end up in present time by the time you got there.
And if you were to fly away from earth really fast and look back with a telescope you could see back in time but no telescope or tech would make out any detail and by the time you got back you would be in modern regular time.
We can’t even come close to colonizing the moon or even have recreational space trips but people talk about a trip to mars and time travel eh?
It’s 2020!
They said flying cars and holographic/robotic girlfriends would be real by now but Noooo!
We don’t have any of that! eh?
@old-indian saidTime travel by going back in time is impossible. I'm not sure about the future, but I have my doubts about that.
Let’s say time travel became possible eh?
What force would stop the human in the machine from returning to an unborn state?
If you could make the universe go back in time why would you assume the human running that machine wouldn’t go back also?
It’s a dumb idea/theory
And...
Time travel assumes that everything was recorded eh?
Nope.
The idea of time travel ...[text shortened]... nd holographic/robotic girlfriends would be real by now but Noooo!
We don’t have any of that! eh?
@old-indian saidWrong. My ex-girlfriend was robotic almost all the time.
Let’s say time travel became possible eh?
It’s 2020!
They said flying cars and holographic/robotic girlfriends would be real by now but Noooo!
We don’t have any of that! eh?
@Metal-Brain
I said in another thread science is still in kindergarten so saying going back in time is flat ass impossible is a bit premature.
We have no idea what will be produced in science in the next 300 years or so.
We may by that time find a way to go way faster than the speed of light for instance, which may be tied to going back in time.
And as far as going FORWARD in time, seeing ones own personal future as it happens here on Earth, we know for a fact going fast alters the flow of time INTERNALLY to the spacecraft and all within it so you go to within a hairs breath of light speed, where on ship time you go say a thousand light years that appears to you the time that went by is a week, and you go back home the way you just came, another week for you, a two week trip, you get back home on Earth and find THEIR time says 2000 YEARS have passed so you in fact have traveled into your personal future.
THAT is not impossible. VERY FUKKING DIFFICULT but not out of the bounds of known physics.
@sonhouse saidWe are already going forward in time.
@Metal-Brain
I said in another thread science is still in kindergarten so saying going back in time is flat ass impossible is a bit premature.
We have no idea what will be produced in science in the next 300 years or so.
We may by that time find a way to go way faster than the speed of light for instance, which may be tied to going back in time.
And as far as going FORW ...[text shortened]... future.
THAT is not impossible. VERY FUKKING DIFFICULT but not out of the bounds of known physics.
@Metal-Brain
You said you were not sure about going forwards in time and I just showed an example of how you could do that faster than we already are moving forwards in time.
@sonhouse saidI never said that. I never said forward at all. I said future.
@Metal-Brain
You said you were not sure about going forwards in time and I just showed an example of how you could do that faster than we already are moving forwards in time.
Stop lying.
@metal-brain saidYou just said in your previous post;
I never said forward at all. I said future.
Stop lying.
" We are already going forward in time. " (Your quote. My emphasis)
So its not him who is lying; Its you.
- Joined
- 20 May 17
- Moves
- 18083
Sorry, my first post wasn't worded well...what I meant was, since two particles (no matter how distant), are instantly affected, then there would be zero travel TIME between the two particles . If there were two (manned) spaceships, 10 light years apart, and they were entangled, then the travel time between them would be ZERO.
@ogb
I think the best we can hope for would be instant information transfer, like sub-space communication on Star Trek.