25 Jul 17
2 edits
Originally posted by @freakykbhPretty hard to find:
I am having a tough time finding a good animation of the upcoming total eclipse.
Anyone have a good source?
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4579
Also here is a satellite image of Antarctica sea ice and land ice, false colors but image from landsat.
https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/details.cgi?aid=4577&button=recent
25 Jul 17
Originally posted by @sonhouseNo, it isn't.
Also here is a satellite image of Antarctica ....
Its a compound of hundreds of Landsat images combined into a mosaic then combined with sea ice data from other satellites (not imaging satellites).
25 Jul 17
Originally posted by @twhiteheadThis image is one only. How they put it together I don't care about.
No, it isn't.
Its a compound of hundreds of Landsat images combined into a mosaic then combined with sea ice data from other satellites (not imaging satellites).
But it shows the Antarctica in a correct way. Not the flat earth way.
Let's see if MrFreaky accepts this image! 😉
25 Jul 17
Originally posted by @chaney3Repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true.
The sizes, distances and orbits of the sun, moon and earth are NO coincidence.
It is all by design, and what makes the eclipse happen.
Originally posted by @twhiteheadDenying the truth like a broken clock does not make the denial true.
Repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true.
Especially when it has been clearly shown to you.
25 Jul 17
Originally posted by @fabianfnasI'm more interested in seeing an animation which shows:
This image is one only. How they put it together I don't care about.
But it shows the Antarctica in a correct way. Not the flat earth way.
Let's see if MrFreaky accepts this image! 😉
• the earth rotating on its axis
• at its actual speed
• at its current tilt degree
• in the right direction
• as it orbits the sun
• with the moon orbiting the earth
• at its actual speed
• in proportion to the earth's spin and trajectory around the sun
Can't seem to find anything with all of these ingredients.
Repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true...
25 Jul 17
Originally posted by @lemon-limeIs that true?
Repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true
repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true
repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true
repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true
repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true
repeating something like a broken clock won't make ...[text shortened]... broken clock won't make it true
repeating something like a broken clock won't make it true...
I noticed you only said it nine times, and I thought the rule was ten?
26 Jul 17
Originally posted by @chaney3How do you explain the fact Luna is receding from Earth a few inches every year and some time in the future there will be no total eclipses of the sun?
The sizes, distances and orbits of the sun, moon and earth are NO coincidence.
It is all by design, and what makes the eclipse happen.
26 Jul 17
2 edits
Originally posted by @sonhouseIsn't there a thread designed for the 'miracle of total eclipse' already?
How do you explain the fact Luna is receding from Earth a few inches every year and some time in the future there will be no total eclipses of the sun?
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/science/the-moon-and-design.171662
Didn't Chaney lose that debate? Why bring that nonsense up again?
Does he want to lose again?
Originally posted by @fabianfnasFor the record, I completely won that debate. Despite this being more of an atheist forum, than of science.
Isn't there a thread designed for the 'miracle of total eclipse' already?
https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/science/the-moon-and-design.171662
Didn't Chaney lose that debate? Why bring that nonsense up again?
Does he want to lose again?
26 Jul 17
Originally posted by @chaney3You are really delusional if you think you won. Didn't you even read my post that the moon is receding from Earth about 3 or 4 inches per year and some time in the future there will be no more eclipses? Also the first eclipses started about 1 billion years ago before there was even life on Earth so just why would that be something a god did? For what purpose? A billion years of eclipses and 999 million years later we come on the scene and you think it was all because of GOD? Get serious. Or Sirius, that would even be better....
For the record, I completely won that debate. Despite this being more of an atheist forum, than of science.