Originally posted by RJHinds
It stands to reason through common sense and logic that there must be a reason for everything, because the universe follows specific laws in an orderly manner. It is the job of science to tell us how something works within the laws that are already established, but apparently not why according to your buddy. On the other had, it is too much for you to thin ...[text shortened]... bout so you regulate it to a brute fact so you don't have to think about it anymore. Good job.
It stands to reason through common sense and logic that there must be a reason for everything, because the universe follows specific laws in an orderly manner.
How do you derive the conclusion that “ there must be a reason for everything” from “ the universe follows specific laws in an orderly manner”? -One clearly does NOT logically follow from the other. Your reasoning is totally confused and totally logically flawed.
Why there must be a reason why “the universe follows specific laws in an orderly manner”? Is that because “the universe follows specific laws in an orderly manner”? i.e circular reasoning? Explain....
Note that All circular reasoning is logically flawed ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_reasoning ).
On the other had, it is too much for you to think about so you regulate it to a brute fact so you don't have to think about it anymore.
Nope, the concept of brute facts is just too much for you to think about so you say “there must be a reason for everything” so you don't have to think about it any more.
You have yet to give us a valid reason why there must be a why to everything or, in other words, why there cannot be a brute fact.
-So WHY cannot there be a brute fact? -just try and explain that WHY but without cheaply fudging the question with confused twisted illogic and just for once in your life you may actually think for real!