02 Jan '14 13:46>
Originally posted by lemon limeWhen you come across something that you don't recognize in any way the only correct assumption is to say it was not "created". And even more so when you are not familiar with whatever could have created it.
Something that intentionally reproduces or replicates itself is a huge clue, but it's not necessarily the only clue, or even the most important marker for determining if something is naturally formed or intentionally constructed.
Any archaeologist will tell you that an unearthed clay pot was made by human hands, but no one assumes the clay pot might be ...[text shortened]... happenstance as a result of pursuing a purpose (such as leaving literal footprints in the soil).
For instance in the case of the computer: even if you don't know what it is, you will recognize there are electrical components in there. And it's being held together by screws. And there are people around you who - just like you - are familiar with screws. In that case the most obvious assumption is to say "this is not natural".
But say you travel to a distant planet, you don't see any signs of intelligent life and you come across a strange looking structure (of rocks or something) which makes weird sounds but you don't recognize it in any way, then the most obvious assumption is to say that it is natural, until proven otherwise.
It should also be noted that using the word "purpose" can be dangerous. You can say "the purpose of DNA is for life to evolve" but you can also say "Life evolves because of certain characteristics of DNA". The first description might be heard as being a subjective description whereas the second is much more objective.
Although we do know DNA, we don't recognize it - or part of it - as being created and more importantly (I've said this before and so has Humy, albeit in a diiferent way) if we are saying that DNA was created we are making it far more complicated than it was (Occam's razor) because not only do we not "know" or recognize the "created" (DNA) but we also don't know the creator (...). Hence, until proven otherwise, DNA is natural.