24 Jul 05
Originally posted by SerendipityDatabase and books are allowed,so I don't understand what you're trying to say.
Whats the poiont of playing chess if most people here use databass and books??
Tell me how you learn complex openings without reading a book or consulting some database or opening database............do you figure out how to play the Sicilian Dragon or the Old Benoni by yourself?
24 Jul 05
Originally posted by SerendipityRating is only a number and means nothing and I'm sure that everyone is happy that I don't go around spamming forums with crap like you're doing nowadays.
And...riddle me this ...if you're a genius compared to me why is my rating higher than yours oh wise one?
I have something better to do now,get lost my gullible friend.
24 Jul 05
Originally posted by Ravelloooohhhhh.....i HIT A REAL RAW NERVE THERE!!!!!!!!!
Rating is only a number and means nothing and I'm sure that everyone is happy that I don't go around spamming forums with crap like you're doing nowadays.
I have something better to do now,get lost my gullible friend.
FRAGILE EGO UH...EXPLAINS ALOT...i
25 Jul 05
I think this is actually not a bad idea; however, instead of taking back a move in a game you lost, a better idea would be to allow easy import of a FEN into the "Set Piece" interface. Then, make the "analyze board" feature print out the FEN as you step through the game.
That way, if you or your partner makes a screwy move, or if you just want to replay from a certain position, you can open up the game, move backwards until you have the position you want, copy the FEN, and then import this FEN into a new game.
So, it's not really taking back a move, but just letting you replay a position and avoid a mistake. Since the new game is a set piece, it won't affect ratings.
What do you think?