Originally posted by AikoWhy,this is wonderful news.Not only have I irked you but you are willing to waste your time trying to irk me.It's a Mc win win sitchiasion(sic).Grumpiness too all ,and too all a grumpy day.😏
Ha! Just for you, grumpy old man, I shall revive my idea every now and then with a post up here...!
Originally posted by AikoThose who cannot solve this
I always have the feeling when I am close to checkmating my opponent and when I am making my final move, it will turn out to be not a checkmate yet. I thought of the idea of the analyze board function to be of use to detect a checkmate if you position the pieces around on the board. It will be of use too when I am working through different positions to see whic ...[text shortened]... lyze board function be extended with a checkmate detection? Or is that a bit too much of an aid?
Thread 34320
should not play chess!
Originally posted by BowmannInteresting new use of the word "solve". I will bear it in mind in the future.
Those who cannot solve this
Thread 34320
should not play chess!
- Joined
- 23 Mar 04
- Moves
- 264352
Originally posted by zakkwylderNow, take a pill and become more relaxed. It is not to help out where mentally I am lacking something, I just wanted a functionality to aid in detection so I can quickly figure out different positions and receiving a conformation at the end of each position for a checkmate position. Call it lazyness, if you really feel you need to say something bad about it.
This is the stupidest thing I've heard lately. If you can't tell whether its checkmate or not, walk away from the chess board and don't come back.
Originally posted by AikoI do... and I will.
Now, take a pill and become more relaxed. It is not to help out where mentally I am lacking something, I just wanted a functionality to aid in detection so I can quickly figure out different positions and receiving a conformation at the end of each position for a checkmate position. Call it lazyness, if you really feel you need to say something bad about it.
