Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhy don't you take a crack at my question.
because we have a viable system no need to waste time of crackpot ideas.
2 clans with clan ratings 300 points apart have a 1 player challenge in front of them where the 2 players are equally rated.
Yet one clan stands to gain 5 rating points by winning and the other 30 rating points.
Yet each clan has a 50% chance of winning.
Why would the higher rated clan even agree to this challenge ??
And before you tell me player ratings are irrelevant, what do clan leaders who issue the challenge look at ??
You're a clan leader (we think).
They look at the players !!
They select the players from both clans for the challenge.
Based on player strength !!
And with the 200 point rating protection, the challenges will balanced.
In this example, the challenge will never happen !!
A lot of fair challenges will be wiped out by this new regime !!
But we all know you like it.
It gives you the utopia you crave !!
But in the interests of reality, please answer this question.
Or don't answer it !!
It is on Russ' plate either way.
Originally posted by mghrn55This already happens between individual players, you are griping about nothing again, Mahgoobs.
Why don't you take a crack at my question.
2 clans with clan ratings 300 points apart have a 1 player challenge in front of them where the 2 players are equally rated.
Yet one clan stands to gain 5 rating points by winning and the other 30 rating points.
Yet each clan has a 50% chance of winning.
Why would the higher rated clan even agree to thi ...[text shortened]... ality, please answer this question.
Or don't answer it !!
It is on Russ' plate either way.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieClans are different.
This already happens between individual players, you are griping about nothing again, Mahgoobs.
The players are equally rated and the challenge is balanced.
The risk reward is not balanced !!
For you to be griping for years about inequality and now stick your head in the sand on this good question is par for the course for you.
Originally posted by mghrn55yeah because you say so, neeeext spangle, send him in please.
Clans are different.
The players are equally rated and the challenge is balanced.
The risk reward is not balanced !!
For you to be griping for years about inequality and now stick your head in the sand on this good question is par for the course for you.
- Joined
- 17 Jun 08
- Moves
- 179883
The point is valid
If the clan rating by itself is used to determine the winner, the system is less playable
No way to go up significantly, if you're at or near the top
Little enticement to play a lower ranked clan rating-wise
It's better to decline challenges and preserve your rating
Clan play is different that individual play
Additional metrics, like net or gross points, should also be considered
Originally posted by padgerthe ELO is good but no use for the clans its like using the rules of tennis for football or snooker for rugby, totally will not work,
The whole ELO system is flawed because it was meant for a player not a group of players
If this is implemented it will just end in stagnation with no clans accepting challenges from other clans and everybody finishing up with the same rating
russ has said it willl be to complicated for a seperate player clan rating for each player but we are getting a clan rating that makes no sense and will not stop sand bagging or collusion.
only the biggest cheat on here wants it, i wonder why?
points removal suspension that will be a good start
no amnesty