Originally posted by RagnorakOh, I quite like the borders - it makes the avatars look classy. Besides, the extension already has an update and so all is right again. 🙂
Now that we want the option to have bigger avatars, along comes a border which makes the actual avatar smaller, and breaks Ouroboros' script.
D
Originally posted by tmetzlerWouldn't that reduce many users to just a name? I use it to quickly scan for posts I might want to read, or not read.
I still want the option to turn OFF avatar viewing, completely.
There is a way to freeze all avatars... so you are not bothered by flashing avatars or unsavory characters on guitar.
With Firefox there is a way to click an image and it gets blocked for good. You could even block the sites those jerks who make a new avatar every 5 days use... photobucket, google... others. 😉
P-
Originally posted by PhlabibitOptions for avatars.
Wouldn't that reduce many users to just a name? I use it to quickly scan for posts I might want to read, or not read.
There is a way to freeze all avatars... so you are not bothered by flashing avatars or unsavory characters on guitar.
With Firefox there is a way to click an image and it gets blocked for good. You could even block the sites those jerks who make a new avatar every 5 days use... photobucket, google... others. 😉
P-
None
50x50
100x100
200x200
It's the way to go. Let users set it up as to their personal preferences/internet speed.
D
- Joined
- 03 Sep 03
- Moves
- 89331
Originally posted by PhlabibitWhy should I have to jump through any hoops, when I *could* just click a forum setting that would hide them all from me? Why do you want to limit my choices? 🙁
Wouldn't that reduce many users to just a name? I use it to quickly scan for posts I might want to read, or not read.
And whats the difference between reducing them to a name or name+avatar. I find the avatars distracting and pointless. If I could reduce you all to just a name, or less even. I would happily do so.
Originally posted by RagnorakCurrently avatars are scaled down from the original source so it doesn't matter if it displays at 50x50 or 200x200, the full image still loads.
Options for avatars.
None
50x50
100x100
200x200
It's the way to go. Let users set it up as to their personal preferences/internet speed.
D
I don't understand why we don't have avatars hosted on RHP itself which means that size and dimension limits can be put in place (no more people uploading 500kB gifs).
2 edits
Originally posted by Aiko"We will be forcing people to upload avatars soon, rather than linking as we do at the moment, which will remove the problem and help out everyone with no free web space"
Because the strain (hosting all images and distributing them with each forum page view, legal issues) will be on RHP, not on the shoulders of those want it anyway.
-Russ
Thread 64115