limit to clan games

How about rather than a clan availability that is either on or off, clan members could enter a number of clan games they will take? This would be just like the My Challenge Setting, only specifically for clan games? When that number of games is filled, they go unavailable, keeping them from being given more games then they wanted as new challenges start. This would also eliminate a need to go to those clan availability settings and have to switch them on and off.

rec'd with the addition that specific limits could be set for each clan. then, also, those limits should be posted publicly in the profile.

That way a clan leader could decide that it's okay that a player will only play 5 games for their clan but 10 games for that other clan.

yep a good idea, would be very help full

also what does "rec'd" stand for?

recommended. I play on another ches site and the rules are a little bit different.

Andre

Originally posted by patrickrutgers
How about rather than a clan availability that is either on or off, clan members could enter a number of clan games they will take? This would be just like the My Challenge Setting, only specifically for clan games? When that number of games is filled, they go unavailable, keeping them from being given more games then they wanted as new challenges sta ...[text shortened]... o eliminate a need to go to those clan availability settings and have to switch them on and off.

Originally posted by padger
The reason for being able to turn off their availability is when they go missing for what ever reason not the amount of games they are playing
It is so annoying to get challenges with that player in the challenge and have to refuse it over and over again
You have to give them some time to come back before you Kick them

Originally posted by patrickrutgers
I agree with you, and rec'd the suggestion in another thread that clan leaders be able to turn off their members' availability, which is what you seem to be advocating here. I don't think that idea and my idea are at odds in anyway.

Originally posted by O Artem O
yep a good idea, would be very help full

also what does "rec'd" stand for?

Just to keep this on top
Is anyone against this Idea

I'd like to see both ideas implemented. At the moment I track this privately and it'd be great to have it supported by the site's challenge logic.

Originally posted by padger
Just to keep this on top
Is anyone against this Idea

Originally posted by Mctayto
Yes I am against this idea.
If a member has enough games they can switch off availability therefore the volume is already under control.
We need management tools not lazy tools

Originally posted by padger
Have you read all the posts ?

Originally posted by Mctayto
Yes I have, I agree with the leader having the ability to switch a member to unavailable saus but not to limits imposed re game numbers.

Originally posted by coquette
rec'd with the addition that specific limits could be set for each clan.