31 Mar '14 16:333 edits

How about no more tiebreakers in groups or in final-round of tournaments?

For example if two people have 26 points. The winner of those two would be the one who had 1 win and a tie or beating that opponent twice. If they both went one win against each other then the tiebreaker could be who won most games as black in that tournament. And if they were tied how about who finished all their games the fastest. And if they both finished against each other last then it would go down to who finished against other opponents the fastest.

Other tie breakers could be least moves and most points in piece count as example for group sizes of 2, 3, or 4.

For example if two people have 26 points. The winner of those two would be the one who had 1 win and a tie or beating that opponent twice. If they both went one win against each other then the tiebreaker could be who won most games as black in that tournament. And if they were tied how about who finished all their games the fastest. And if they both finished against each other last then it would go down to who finished against other opponents the fastest.

Other tie breakers could be least moves and most points in piece count as example for group sizes of 2, 3, or 4.