08 May '09 09:54>
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
The post that was quoted here has been removedIs it right that everyone should be prevented from posting pictures simply because some eejit MAY post vulgarities?
The post that was quoted here has been removedso just as with avatars, only allow [img] tags to work from Subscribers.
Originally posted by NowakowskiHmmm, this is probably the only way to go.
so just as with avatars, only allow [img] tags to work from Subscribers.
The odds of a subscriber getting his account banned due to improper pictures being posted, is much less than just a free account.
Originally posted by CrowleyDefinitely NO SIGNATURE pictures please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I just don't want these forums to go the way of many others - where they have apparently a 'Who can have the BIGGEST and COOLEST signatures and avatars. LULZ!'
Originally posted by Dr StrangeloveWhat I mean is, even if we don't specifically have signatures like phpBB type systems have, people may start using signatures in their posts and how will we stop them?
Definitely NO SIGNATURE pictures please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They could be separately disallowed surely.
The post that was quoted here has been removedVULGARITYVULGARITYVULGARITYVULGARITYVULGARITY