Wouldn't it be good to play games with the agreed opportunity between players, even if unrated or rated games, to teach each other about bad moves and be able to reverse moves agreed by both players, so as to see the benefit of learning? I've discussed this with quite a few players.... and they like the idea. Is it possible?
Its unfair chess is based on mistakes and i dont think you should be able to do this in rated games.But in unrated games is different i think that would be fine but the opponent would have to agree to this aswell.🙂
Originally posted by Smiffy Its unfair chess is based on mistakes and i dont think you should be able to do this in rated games.But in unrated games is different i think that would be fine but the opponent would have to agree to this aswell.🙂
...and this must mutually be agreed on at beforehand.
We agree on thinking times before we start a game, we agree on if it is rated or not - so if this become a new feature (that can take back a move), it must be agreed on before the game starts.
Possibility on taking back moves? Well, I would never agree on such a thing.
Originally posted by mikelom Wouldn't it be good to play games with the agreed opportunity between players, even if unrated or rated games, to teach each other about bad moves and be able to reverse moves agreed by both players, so as to see the benefit of learning? I've discussed this with quite a few players.... and they like the idea. Is it possible?
Rated games NEVER. This falls under the category of outside help, and that shouldn't affect a player's rating at all. Unrated... perhaps, but I doubt Russ or Chris will ever bother.
To play these games, use the PM feature and exchange PGN text. You can take a move back if you like easy. You could also PM the tutor with your idea of a move, and they could tell you if it's a solid move or a blunder. No need to take back if you discuss the move.
i have read what you said and this is an opinion and like the other guys have said in rated games no way its not fair but unrated maybe but like fabian said must be agreed prior the game.i would never agree to it and i dont think really that its really that good an idea and like phlaby said russ or chris have better ideas to do than this
Originally posted by mikelom You have all agreed with what I wrote! Did you actually read the wording?? 😞
It is something that a "huge", re-quote ""huge"", amount of members have said they woud like to indulge in....
If you didn't read, then let me re-iterate... 'agreed oportunity' , 'unrated or agreed rated', etc... please read!
Seems there is gathered opinion...
It would ...[text shortened]... from players of a greater ability..... like the same way to assess engines....... 😛
Look, I've told you how to do it if you want. Lots of people have asked lots of bad ideas. Should Russ initiate all bad ideas just because several people have asked for it?
Originally posted by mikelom Wouldn't it be good to play games with the agreed opportunity between players, even if unrated or rated games, to teach each other about bad moves and be able to reverse moves agreed by both players, so as to see the benefit of learning? I've discussed this with quite a few players.... and they like the idea. Is it possible?
game discussion is partially why we have a chess forum.
want to discuss a game?
take it there, we'll help you with it.
Originally posted by Phlabibit Look, I've told you how to do it if you want. Lots of people have asked lots of bad ideas. Should Russ initiate all bad ideas just because several people have asked for it?
P-
OOwa! Calm down..... I was under the influence! 😉 😉
11 Dec '07 13:09
Reverse moves
Back to Top