Should the TOS be amended?

Should the TOS be amended to refelct the new reality that the rules do not apply to members of certain clans and groups?

Originally posted by Red Night
Should the TOS be amended to refelct the new reality that the rules do not apply to members of certain clans and groups?

Yes, perhaps it could also include grounds for instant dismissal for smug, self-righteous trolls.

Originally posted by Starrman
Yes, perhaps it could also include grounds for instant dismissal for smug, self-righteous trolls.

That rule wouldn't hurt you much.

You could just use your PFC get out of jail free card and you'ld be out of self-righteous troll jail before you could say rumpledarvlay.

Originally posted by Red Night
That rule wouldn't hurt you much.

You could just use your PFC get out of jail free card and you'ld be out of self-righteous troll jail before you could say rumpledarvlay.

What a crybaby.

I suggest the TOS be amended so that all decisions by Russ must be approved, in advance, by Red Night. That is, after all, the only thing that would keep him and the TSM happy.

Originally posted by Starrman
Yes, perhaps it could also include grounds for instant dismissal for smug, self-righteous trolls.

There is nothing inherently wrong with being smug, or self-righteous as long as you are in the right.

If you want people to not be smug/self-righteous, then be correct yourself and the other person will not be able to fall into that position.

Originally posted by uzless
There is nothing inherently wrong with being smug, or self-righteous as long as you are in the right.

If you want people to not be smug/self-righteous, then be correct yourself and the other person will not be able to fall into that position.

Are you new here?

P-

With that farce of re-instating darvy directly opposite of the TOS, I have declared an opposite day for uzless. All posts will be well-wishes, supportive, and helpful comments.

I enjoy your posts phlabibit. Your bring light and levity. If you were a sundae I would lick you.

Originally posted by uzless
With that farce of re-instating darvy directly opposite of the TOS, I have declared an opposite day for uzless. All posts will be well-wishes, supportive, and helpful comments.

I enjoy your posts phlabibit. Your bring light and levity. If you were a sundae I would lick you.

Could you please direct me to the section of the TOS which states that the Site Admins cannot reinstate someone they banned if they so desire?

Thank you.

Originally posted by no1marauder
Could you please direct me to the section of the TOS which states that the Site Admins cannot reinstate someone they banned if they so desire?

Thank you.

Only a fool in here would think he's got anythin' to prove

Originally posted by uzless
There is nothing inherently wrong with being smug, or self-righteous as long as you are in the right.

If you want people to not be smug/self-righteous, then be correct yourself and the other person will not be able to fall into that position.

...and the "right" is whatever you believe in.

Originally posted by uzless
Only a fool in here would think he's got anythin' to prove

A fool could (and did) claim that reinstating Darvlay was "directly opposite of the TOS".

Originally posted by Red Night
Should the TOS be amended to refelct the new reality that the rules do not apply to members of certain clans and groups?

That is a good question.

I think that certain Non-Subs (not all) should be limited to so many posts a day, so we don't have to put up with so much of their drivel. Perhaps 10 like is done with the PM's would be a perfect number?

We the paying subs would say who these Non-Subs would be.

Originally posted by Very Rusty
We the paying subs would say who these Non-Subs would be.

Well well, looks who's getting all elitist...

Originally posted by Raven69
Well well, looks who's getting all elitist...

Perhaps while were at it, get rid of anyone with a 69 at the end or beginning of their name as it is a known sexual postition, and this is a 13+ Site! Doesn't matter if they are actually 69 either!

Well not them actually, just the number 69.

Originally posted by Very Rusty
That is a good question.

I think that certain Non-Subs (not all) should be limited to so many posts a day, so we don't have to put up with so much of their drivel. Perhaps 10 like is done with the PM's would be a perfect number?

We the paying subs would say who these Non-Subs would be.

While I agree that it would be nice to limit certain people's posting ability for all of our sanity, I believe in free speech.

Every moron, from defrauder to crowley, has the same right to spout their idiotic opinions as every other user.