Siege Autostart

I know I posted this before, but there are currently 31 sieges not being played because the next game hasn't started. This is unfair to those who are queued up. I think the games either need to autostart, or you lose your place at the head of the queue if you don't start the game within the siege boards timebank (this would be required of the attacker, not the defender).

Also, a page listing intended improvements to the site and a general priority for them would be nice and possibly cut down on threads in this forum...

Regards
Z

rec'd i really agree with this 🙂

I too agree.
The sieges should be monitored, manually or automatically, not to creating any hang ups.

Originally posted by zebano
I know I posted this before, but there are currently 31 sieges not being played because the next game hasn't started. This is unfair to those who are queued up. I think the games either need to autostart, or you lose your place at the head of the queue if you don't start the game within the siege boards timebank (this would be required of the attacker, not th ...[text shortened]... riority for them would be nice and possibly cut down on threads in this forum...

Regards
Z

your supposed to get a message 🙂

Originally posted by leisurelysloth
How does the attacker, who's probably been waiting in queue for months, know when it's time to start the game?

Originally posted by zebano
I know I posted this before, but there are currently 31 sieges not being played because the next game hasn't started. This is unfair to those who are queued up. I think the games either need to autostart, or you lose your place at the head of the queue if you don't start the game within the siege boards timebank (this would be required of the attacker, not th ...[text shortened]... riority for them would be nice and possibly cut down on threads in this forum...

Regards
Z