09 Jan '05 17:57>
Originally posted by arrakisI would just as soon as soon close this discussion, but you keep distorting the facts so you can continue to play the victim while at the same time accusing others of posting "hate mail" against you, I will again ask the question you have refused to answer.
YES! The game mods are supposed to protect members by limiting the amount of cheating.
While I'm here I'd like to mention that I accept all responsibility for the lag of time it took to lick JW off the team. Latex Bishop had suggested to me that we should kick him because of the messages posted that he was cheating, but he left it as my decision cause I ...[text shortened]... ate mail towards myself, but to those who can think for themselves and make their own decisions.
James Woodley was a 1200 rated player for many months. The evidence suggests that he cheated to even acheive that level by playing rigged games against ian93 (who was either a 2nd account or a friend deliberately losing to JW). In late September without any prior improvement, he suddenly starting winning EVERY GAME against players of equal rating and then against players rated hundreds of points higher. Please explain as someone of such vast experience how he could do this without cheating as I'm sure there are numerous players on this site who'd like to know how to improve their game in a similar non-cheating fashion.
You claim to be an experienced player and I believe that. You also claim that your experience qualifies you to be a Game Moderator. Please either answer the question above or admit that you made a lapse in judgment in late November by allowing Woodley on your team when the evidence, irrespective of any engine analysis, showed he was cheating as there is no other explanation for the facts above. If you will do that, I personally won't post anymore regarding the matter but if you keep insisting that the evidence in late November against Woodley was "insufficient" you are not qualified to be a Game Mod, period.