Go back
A False Sense of Security

A False Sense of Security

Spirituality

1 edit

@petewxyz said
I think you also probably believe your observations are valid. I would imagine with great certainty.
Well, it was you ~ not me ~ who said earlier on this thread: "I try and approach most things from a position of not understanding and not knowing. I think you learn more from others that way and I don't think this is a disingenuous stance...". Were you being disingenuous after all, then?

Sure. I know and understand stuff about what faith and belief are, what atheism is, what conversion and loss of faith are, and I understand the word "ethics". So, yes, I try to share what I think are valid observations. Why wouldn't I?


@petewxyz said
Looks like Kegge and me also don't always pick the best language whilst making valid observations, this could work.
And Dive is an avid Chelsea fan, and sore loser. So if you’re sporting Liverpool colors you automatically have a target on your back.


@petewxyz said
I do sometimes find these social media conversations embarrassing.
We've all be there old chap. In this forum in particular, quickly own an erroneous statement, never double-down.






-Removed-
I think the Duchess is the best exemplar of such a behaviour, digging a hole deeper for herself rather than holding her hands up to an error of judgment or false statement.


@ghost-of-a-duke said
I think the Duchess is the best exemplar of such a behaviour, digging a hole deeper for herself rather than holding her hands up to an error of judgment or false statement.
To clarify the above, I wasn't comparing Pete to the Duchess. That would be unfair on anybody.


I am usually able to make myself understood, but of course that does depend on the willingness of the listener to understand. I will take the distribution of green and red thumbs to indicate that this has been more about the willingness of the listener and make no further attempt to explain my comments.


Vote Up
Vote Down

-Removed-
See my comment at 11.23


@petewxyz said
I think that admittedly badly worded sentence is being taken out of context of the post it was in. As opposed to anybody wishing to find the meaning of the post they seem to want me to defend a position that I wasn't trying to talk about. It's a shame because I think there is a potentially interesting conversation about the implications of believing 100% that the end of life ...[text shortened]... st that was ill worded and not the point of the post or I might find myself in very strange company.
Welcome to the Spirituality forum.

That's just how it is here.

Believe me, you don't have to agree with it to post here, and you also don't have to endlessly answer every minute stick in the mud who tries to gaslight the forum with their idea of you as a 'know-nothing'.

You'll learn who wishes actual conversation and who wishes to just piss on everything you say.

Remember, this is a forum of ideas, despite that some seem to think that the one with the most words wins.


@petewxyz said
I am usually able to make myself understood, but of course that does depend on the willingness of the listener to understand. I will take the distribution of green and red thumbs to indicate that this has been more about the willingness of the listener and make no further attempt to explain my comments.
This poat by you is an example of the "doubling down" Ghost of a Duke mentioned.


Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.