@ghost-of-a-duke saidIf science can only measure and deal with what we see and can quantify the observable and materialist, exactly how could it rule out the invisible and spiritual? I do believe science is the last thing that can expel God from the universe. It isn't equipped even to see or touch the supernatural, let alone rule it out.
I don't recall you ever asking me that question, but then I do have a tendency to speed read your epistles.
Science has shown enough to rule out the likelihood of a deity.
@ghost-of-a-duke saidA truth claim I would liken him to a man born blind arguing that red smells like a duck, he has no clue, but is happy to voice his opinion about things he does not know.
In God: The Failed Hypothesis, physicist Victor Stenger argues that science has advanced sufficiently to make a definitive statement on the existence or nonexistence of the traditional Judeo-Christian-Islamic God. He invites readers to put their minds--and the scientific method--to work to test this claim.
After evaluating all the scientific evidence--the studies d ...[text shortened]... ually point to his nonexistence.
https://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-01/pb-spe013007.php
@kellyjay saidThis sounds like a manifesto that enables you to assert whatever you like ~ anything your imagination and dysfunctional moral compass might like to conjure up ~ only then for you to dismiss dissenters as being "not equipped" to disagree with whatever religious mumbo jumbo that happens to be floating your personal, subjective, superstitious boats.
If science can only measure and deal with what we see and can quantify the observable and materialist, exactly how could it rule out the invisible and spiritual? I do believe science is the last thing that can expel God from the universe. It isn't equipped even to see or touch the supernatural, let alone rule it out.