Originally posted by KellyJayYou're dodging the question: if you told a murdering psychopath that you "deny Christ" would it ~ for you, in your case, with your beliefs ~ mean that you actually did "deny Christ" in your heart?
Did you see an exception about where it is okay to deny Christ in scripture?
Kelly
Originally posted by FMFYes, if I thought so little of Christ that I would to save my life I could just
You're dodging the question: if you told a murdering psychopath that you "deny Christ" would it ~ for you, in your case, with your beliefs ~ mean that you actually did "deny Christ" in your heart?
deny Him, it would be for me to equal to denying him in my heart.
Kelly
Originally posted by robbie carrobieWhere in the article presented in OP can we read anything about Yousef Al-Kharboush?
Religion kills. Medicine saves.
Clearly its not the case, infact, was it religion or medicine that killed baby Yousef Al-Kharboush ?
Why do you constantly try to go off-topic? Why do you want me to go off-topic? Don't you like my questions about the girl and how the doctors saved her despite the religious will of her parents?
Because of the doctors she survived. Her parents rather wanted her dead.
This is what the article is about. Not anything else.
So again - Religion kills, medicine saves. As a JWer, do you agree with this?
Originally posted by KellyJayso pretending to think something is equal to actually thinking it????? what a strange set of pedantic rules your god plays.
Yes, if I thought so little of Christ that I would to save my life I could just
deny Him, it would be for me to equal to denying him in my heart.
Kelly
Originally posted by FabianFnasso your statement is only good for a single paragraph on the Internet and can be dismissed as nonsense elsewhere, gotcha.
Where in the article presented in OP can we read anything about Yousef Al-Kharboush?
Why do you constantly try to go off-topic? Why do you want me to go off-topic? Don't you like my questions about the girl and how the doctors saved her despite the religious will of her parents?
Because of the doctors she survived. Her parents rather wanted her dead ...[text shortened]... anything else.
So again - Religion kills, medicine saves. As a JWer, do you agree with this?
1 edit
Originally posted by stellspalfieThinking about an act is akin to doing it. If you were to read scripture you
so pretending to think something is equal to actually thinking it????? what a strange set of pedantic rules your god plays.
would see Jesus talking about if we look at a woman lustfully has adultery
in his heart already. Our thought life is just as real as our actions, you hate
another and so on are all important things.
Kelly
Matthew 5:27-29
New International Version (NIV)
27 “You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall not commit adultery.’28 But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart. 29 If your right eye causes you to stumble, gouge it out and throw it away. It is better for you to lose one part of your body than for your whole body to be thrown into hell.
-Removed-You don't know if she would have died, don't play God.
I get you and I disagree on this, I believe we both agree getting her the
treatment that would help save her in my opinion would be the right thing
to do.
You will not get me to agree to forcing someone to sin is a good thing even
if death is involved.
Kelly
1 edit
-Removed-Why is that? Do you not really believe what you believe, or are your beliefs less important that other people, or is one of your beliefs that your beliefs should not cause harm to others?
I actually think Kelly is being perfectly reasonable. He believes that even lying that he rejects God is wrong, and he considers it a very serious sin. It is not important where he gets this belief from, or how good his interpretation of the Bible is, it remains his belief. If you expect him to give up that belief because it may potentially lead to his death then you need to provide some argument for why self preservation is more important than beliefs. As a theist I think you will find that practically impossible to make a case for. Even as an atheist, I don't think I could make a satisfactory case.
In fact, I think this deserves its own thread.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieThis is about this article, yes you are right.
so your statement is only good for a single paragraph on the Internet and can be dismissed as nonsense elsewhere, gotcha.
And according to this article - religion would kill if there wouldn't be the brave doctor.
Do you agree in this?