Originally posted by Rajk999
Im not going to waste my time reading up on that but I can guarantee one thing. There is no way in hell that you can assign any meaningful probability to the words of Christ being accurate, 2000 years after he allegedly said them.
And then later in the thread you totally contradict this claim by implying that you have reason to believe that the words do contain at least some accuracy - whereas here you say you have no possible way of knowing.
Here are two probabilities worth remembering though.
100% - thats the probability that you can benefit from what Christ taught.
That is probably true of about just about any text you can possible think of. It all depends on how you apply it.
0% - thats the probability that you will get salvation if you deny the existence of Christ (Im not saying you do).
An interesting claim. It rather contradicts all those claims about God being just, loving, compassionate etc.
I dont think there are any religions who deny that Christ existed.
Well that is to be expected. Either the religions have nothing to do with Christ (in which case they remain silent on the matter) or they are related to Christianity and thus tend to be rather favorable.
I don't believe that Hinduism has anything to say about Jesus specifically and most Hindus that would talk about Christ would probably do so based solely on what they have heard from Christians.
The judgment of Christ is for all mankind, all of whom will be judged according to their works.
And there you go again contradicting yourself. Just a moment ago you said I will be judged for saying that Christ didn't exist, now its based on my works. Make up your mind.