Theists' declaring that their moral compasses involve "absolute morality" is about as subjective as one can get ~ which is OK, really, because morality is subjective.
...atheists ...don’t believe they’ll be held accountable after physical death for their actions and decisions on earth.
Well, you'll end up crossing swords with many of the Christians on this forum, then.
A lot of the Christians here - despite reciting a lot of convoluted dogma - believe they aren't "held accountable after physical death for their actions and decisions on earth" because they are "born again" (already), "forgiven" (already) and "saved" (already)... plus some contrived doctrine about how someone executed 2,000 years ago has already somehow been held accountable on their behalf for their actions and decisions on earth.
You're in for some inter-Christian scraps with some of the supposedly already-forgiven already-saved unaccountable [because 'someone else is accountable'] Christians here in this community.
I am saying that theists calling their personal preferences and opinions about right and wrong "absolute morality" does not, in fact, alter the actual subjective nature of morality.
Bumper sticker level stuff like "Christians face judgment in the afterlife" does not match up with the actual details and implications of the assertions some of the prominent Once Saved Always Saved Christians here make about themselves and about their "relationship" with supernatural phenomena and beings.
A perspective on abortion
19 Oct '18 03:10
Back to Top