Originally posted by divegeester Do you honestly believe "judging" as you reference Christ's use of here, means not entering into discourse of forum etiquette and rules?
Don't you yourself judge the atheists here with your catalogue of threads about them?
Originally posted by divegeester Do you honestly believe "judging" as you reference Christ's use of here, means not entering into discourse of forum etiquette and rules? [Of course not. It's a discourse until someone morphs from principles of courtesy to personal criticism.]
Don't you yourself judge the atheists here with your catalogue of threads about them? [Of course not. God is their judge as well as yours and mine. The Standards set forth in God's Word delineate correct/incorrect behaviour without help from me.]
Originally posted by karoly aczel But drama queens of extremely differing variety.
How's it going anyway Bob? Do you agree with googlefudges' insistence that RJHinds should be banned from the science forum?
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby <--- This reply to karoly? Going well, all things considered... far better than I deserve. googlefudge, RJHinds, karoly aczel and Grampy Bobby will all stand before God for reward or punishment. My opinion on "googlefudges' insistence that RJHinds should be banned from the science forum" is inappropriate and worthless. They'll both give an account one day to Almighty God as will you and I.
Originally posted by divegeester Then why include a reference to "do not judge" as part of your reason for not entering into "discourse" with Karoly axel?
____________________________________________
Originally posted by Grampy Bobby <--- Or this reply to you? Let's clarify the salient point: if RJ violates site rules it's up to admin to decide. Believers in Christ are warned not to judge.