Originally posted by Flower04I agree.
Back to topic, i do ignore people i have played with when they were rassist, stalked or harrassed me. Same as in real life. I got no patience and no excuse for rude expressions like that.
While there is no one on my ignore list at present, this was not always the case.
Originally posted by googlefudgeI have never looked for such a feature either. You haven't ignored me, but sometimes I wish you would, rather than continually trying to censor my speech by telling the Mods to ban me.
Huh. I never knew about that feature.
Probably because I've never wanted to do such a thing. Thankyou.
05 May 14
Originally posted by RJHindsThe science forum is for discussing science.
I have never looked for such a feature either. You haven't ignored me, but sometimes I wish you would, rather than continually trying to censor my speech by telling the Mods to ban me.
You derail every thread that has even the slightest potential relationship to
your creationist religious beliefs by spamming the same religious crap over and
over again.
If you actually were discussing scientific issues there I wouldn't mind...
Hell I would welcome it.
But you have demonstrated beyond all reasonable doubt that you are incapable
of talking about anything other than your religious beliefs.
Which you are completely free to do in the spirituality forum which is dedicated
to the purpose.
It is therefore not in the least unreasonable to ask you to stop talking about your
religion in the science forum.
We don't post topics about the latest developments in science in here, You don't
post your religious objections to every frikin thread in science.
If you can't do that, which you evidently can't being a selfish and self absorbed jerk.
Then we ask the mods to force you to comply.
If that requires banning you then so be it.
I don't actually want you banned, I just want you to stop derailing every thread
in the science forum that discusses biology, geology, cosmology, astronomy....
WE KNOW what you think about these issues, you don't have to tell us every single
time we try to discuss them.
If you want to hold a debate in spirituality about how many angels dance on the head
of a pin, or precisely what a bit of scripture means you will find that thread almost
completely devoid of atheists. Because we have pretty much nothing to say on the issue
other than to say it's all nonsense. You know we think that so we let you just get on with it.
Do us the same courtesy.
Originally posted by googlefudgeWell some of the people on the Science Forum seem to want to hear viewpoints like I bring to the forum. Why else would they start topics on life origins, evolution, and creation, as well as the problem with RJHinds?
The science forum is for discussing science.
You derail every thread that has even the slightest potential relationship to
your creationist religious beliefs by spamming the same religious crap over and
over again.
If you actually were discussing scientific issues there I wouldn't mind...
Hell I would welcome it.
But you have demonstrated b ...[text shortened]... nonsense. You know we think that so we let you just get on with it.
Do us the same courtesy.
Originally posted by RJHindsEvolution is a scientific theory, it's the mainstay of all biology.
Well some of the people on the Science Forum seem to want to hear viewpoints like I bring to the forum. Why else would they start topics on life origins, evolution, and creation, as well as the problem with RJHinds?
Cosmology is the study of how the universe came to exist, it's a popular
and exciting area of physics.
"The problem with RJHinds" was started because you won't shut up.
The fact that you think the above means you should post your religion
all over the science forum is WHY you evidently need to be banned from
it.
Originally posted by googlefudgeCreation and evolution are the two main points of view that have been presented in science for the origins and varieties in species. Evolutionists have actually given up on the origins portion because science has already proven that part of their theory as incorrect and impossible.
Evolution is a scientific theory, it's the mainstay of all biology.
Cosmology is the study of how the universe came to exist, it's a popular
and exciting area of physics.
"The problem with RJHinds" was started because you won't shut up.
The fact that you think the above means you should post your religion
all over the science forum is WHY you evidently need to be banned from
it.
There are still many problems with their branching tree of life idea that I am helping solve in the Science Forum. Just because my view is a minority view does not mean I should be censored, because in the past the minority view has proven by science to be the more correct view.
Just because some, like you, in the Science Forum BELIEVE they know what is science and what is not science does not make them correct. Anyway, the Science Forum is a better place to discuss and debate science related matters than the Spirituality Forum.
Originally posted by karoly aczelGoing well, all things considered... far better than I deserve. googlefudge, RJHinds, karoly aczel and Grampy Bobby will all stand before God for reward or punishment. My opinion on "googlefudges' insistence that RJHinds should be banned from the science forum" is inappropriate and worthless. They'll both give an account one day to Almighty God as will you and I.
But drama queens of extremely differing variety.
How's it going anyway Bob? Do you agree with googlefudges' insistence that RJHinds should be banned from the science forum?
06 May 14
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyLittle bit of a cop-out there GB.
Going well, all things considered... far better than I deserve. googlefudge, RJHinds, karoly aczel and Grampy Bobby will all stand before God for reward or punishment. My opinion on "googlefudges' insistence that RJHinds should be banned from the science forum" is inappropriate and worthless. They'll both give an account one day to Almighty God as will you and I.
Surely you don't think whether or not RJHinds should be banned from an online forum (not the site) is a matter for judgement day?
06 May 14
Originally posted by divegeesterLet's clarify the salient point: if RJ violates site rules it's up to admin to decide. Believers in Christ are warned not to judge.
Little bit of a cop-out there GB.
Surely you don't think whether or not RJHinds should be banned from an online forum (not the site) is a matter for judgement day?
Originally posted by karoly aczelBy the way, karoly, remiss of me not to thank you for asking about my well being. Trust you and your family are well. -Bob
But drama queens of extremely differing variety.
How's it going anyway Bob? Do you agree with googlefudges' insistence that RJHinds should be banned from the science forum?
06 May 14
Originally posted by Grampy BobbyDo you honestly believe "judging" as you reference Christ's use of here, means not entering into discourse of forum etiquette and rules?
Let's clarify the salient point: if RJ violates site rules it's up to admin to decide. Believers in Christ are warned not to judge.
Don't you yourself judge the atheists here with your catalogue of threads about them?