Originally posted by David C
[b]Another refreshing reminder of the "stompingaboutbeatingchestandyellingatthosewhodon'tbelieveinyourgenius" mentality that is so pervasive.
Yes, that mainly comes from the Christian chestbeaters, or hadn't you noticed? Oh, that's right, you just now joined.
Sonny, post hoc ergo propter hoc is a nice way of saying, "don't yell you ...[text shortened]... ssed the part where Jesus was teaching the Jesusbots to be egotistical and overly condescending?
[/b]Most certainly, the stompers are often the irrational Christians - but there are an equal, if not greater amount of chest-thumpers in all the other groups (athiests, gnostics and agnostics).
Good! A little condescension goes a long way, doesn't it? Feel better now?
Mom? When did you learn to type?!
Face it. While this nor the Sumerian tablets may to be conclusive 'proof' that Genesis was plagarized, it is strong evidence. For you to bleat "It's not!" is as much of a logical fallacy as the inverse.
Try this one (a truly hypothetical situation):
A hundred years from now, the Nazi underground has filled the world with its propaganda and convinced most people that WW2 never happened - it's a myth sold my a bunch of fundees who are tarnishing the true face of history. Most records and evidences of the war have been removed and eradicated or just vanished in the mists of time.
While nobody can prove that WW2 was a real event, quite a few still believe it did (and are called closed-minded bigots without knowledge of history). Somebody brings out a book about WW2 (a reprint dated 2007, thought to have been written in the early 1950's, but can't be proven).
So the argument goes: "We've got a le Carre novel here, based on the myth of WW2, that is older (1982 - reprint as well). It has a lot of obviously mythological characteristics about it (Hitler won the war) but there are several similarities between it and your "historical book". It is only logical that your book has plagarized le Carre's mythology to try and sell the myth of WW2."
My argument is this - the only similarities between the Sumerian tablets, the Cairo rock,
hundreds of other works and the Bible is that they tell of a Creation and a Flood.
Is it not possible that the flood and Creation happened and these are multiple (if often, fantastic) retellings of the same events? Writings are often copied and passed on, so one can also not be sure that the Sumerian tablets are an older recounting than the Creation account of Genesis.
I'm sorry, I must have missed the part where Jesus was teaching the Jesusbots to be egotistical and overly condescending?
As Bosse, I'm still trying on the hat of Creationism (seeing if it fits) and while I'm very happy with it, a character comes along every now and again, to whom I just have to remove my hat and fire away...