Originally posted by DoctorScribblesI'd go with 3, bcause the bible does not say the continents did not shift, it does not say, the contents do not shift, and it does not say the continents will not shift.
This is the third installment in my "A Serious Question" series. The first two have been a success, marked by reasonable, on-topic discussion directly addressing the question at hand. Hopefully we may continue in that vein.
This week's question: Do creationists believe in Pangea - the idea that all of earth's continents used to be interlock ...[text shortened]... rizes your beliefs about Pangea. I will be happy to entertain wholly different options as well.
but time I challenge...
1 edit
Originally posted by Bosse de NageYou know, I've been trying to find literal creationists who believe that fossils were put there to "test" their faith; but I can't seem to find any. Most literal creationists I find believe fossils are the result of Noah's flood.
That's right.
It's a spiritual exercise.
Perhaps you should reconsider your option.
EDIT: I sometimes wonder if this whole "God put fossils to test our faith" isn't just a carricature of literal creationists; and there really aren't many (if any) creationists who actually believe that. Of course, if someone can point me to a group who actually do believe that, I'll happily withdraw this point.
1 edit
Originally posted by lucifershammerAre you a thiestic evolutionist?
You know, I've been trying to find literal creationists who believe that fossils were put there to "test" their faith; but I can't seem to find any. Most literal creationists I find believe fossils are the result of Noah's flood.
Perhaps you should reconsider your option.
Fossils to test our faith? Funny one...