Originally posted by knightmeister
...and the purpose of punishing the criminal is to educate him , yes? If the fine is not paid then the cost of the crime is not known and no learning can come from it.
What nonsense. The cost of a crime can be know without a fine being paid and often has no real relationship to the fine anyway. A fine is a form of punishment and not a valuation of the crime. Many crimes cant be valued in monetary terms anyway.
However , if we see the cost to God of our sin (via Jesus's sacrifice) then we learn about what sin is and how it damages our realtionship with God.
Again, instead of answering via the analogy you are going back to the original. A sure sign that your analogy simply did not work and was useless as far as explaining the problem is concerned.
In the bargain we also learn something about God's character (holiness) and the extent to which he will go (death) to get us back ( we see his compassion).
Except of course he didn't die (except maybe by some analogy of the word), didn't get all of us back etc etc, and for the more intelligent of us, didn't get his point across anyway, he just ended up looking like a judge who pays the fines of criminals which makes no sense to me.
If you then take the analogy one step further and imagine the judge is the criminal's dad (I know that would be unethical) then it takes on a new meaning. The judge would be able to demonstrate his love for his son , whilst also upholding the law and respecting justice.
Implying that God is subject to a law higher than himself.
I don't see anything stupid about it.
Thats because you don't seem to understand the purpose of a fine or the criminal justice system in general. And you needed to use God and a father child relationship as an analogy to try to explain it. But yet again, the analogy is not suitable because the situation is different, and thus the question is not answered.