07 Sep 12
Protect your family....
http://en.az24.info/blood-transfusions-alternatives-treatments.html
http://www.noblood.org/
ttp://www.noblood.org/ask-professional/4273-anemia-blood-transfusion-alternatives/
http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/TreatmentsandSideEffects/TreatmentTypes/BloodProductDonationandTransfusion/blood-product-donation-and-transfusion-blood-transfusion-alternatives
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/releases/90943.php
https://www.caring4cancer.com/go/cancer/treatment/blood-transfusions/alternatives-to-blood-transfusions.htm
http://www.testigosdejehova.org/e/19990308/article_01.htm
http://www.medscape.com/index/list_3264_0
07 Sep 12
Originally posted by galveston75Protect your family..............don't answer the door to the JW's. 🙂
Protect your family....
http://en.az24.info/blood-transfusions-alternatives-treatments.html
http://www.noblood.org/
ttp://www.noblood.org/ask-professional/4273-anemia-blood-transfusion-alternatives/
http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/TreatmentsandSideEffects/TreatmentTypes/BloodProductDonationandTransfusion/blood-product-donation-and-transfusi ...[text shortened]... /www.testigosdejehova.org/e/19990308/article_01.htm
http://www.medscape.com/index/list_3264_0
08 Sep 12
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper KnobI'm copying this from my other link....
Not bad people (i'm sure some of you are as in all walks of life), just deluded.
We have no reason to twist what this says, that is something that needs to be made clear.
It seems a few if not most here believe we are some cruel and non caring people. That is the farthest from the truth. We all love our life's and if not even more the lifes our families and even more our children.
By no means do we take this stand of no blood transfusions lightly. This is serious. That would be foolish and cruel on any level of being humane.
But we take the word abstain for what it says. We feel that God meant what he said and until he ever tells us differently, (((( by any means))))) we will obey that command.
So no, we have no reason to "just twist" this command to fit some agenda or for some outrageuos belief. It's as simple as it sounds.
08 Sep 12
Originally posted by galveston75Yes, take the word abstain for what it says - don't eat or drink blood. In what year did the WTBS start adding "blood transfusions" to the biblical prohibition of consuming blood? In the 1870s?
But we take the word abstain for what it says.
08 Sep 12
Originally posted by FMFIt becomes more and more clear that either do not read my post or you just plain and simple do not understand very simple english.
Yes, take the word abstain for what it says - don't eat or drink blood. In what year did the WTBS start adding "blood transfusions" to the biblical prohibition of consuming blood? In the 1870s?
I will not respond to this game you so freakishly play and persist in playing.
Take care and good luck in your search for biblical wisdom.
08 Sep 12
Originally posted by galveston75I can see absolutely nobody on this forum who has been persuaded by reading your posts in these recent discussions. You should consider the possibility that people don't accept what you are asserting rather than telling yourself that they do not understand it.
It becomes more and more clear that either do not read my post or you just plain and simple do not understand very simple english.
I will ask again: in what year did the JW organisation start claiming that "blood transfusions" were subject to the same biblical prohibition as consuming blood?
Was it in the 1870s?
08 Sep 12
Originally posted by FMFTake care.....
I can see absolutely nobody on this forum who has been persuaded by reading your posts in these recent discussions. You should consider the possibility that people don't accept what you are asserting rather than telling yourself that they do not understand it.
I will ask again: in what year did the JW organisation start claiming that "blood transfusions" were subject to the same biblical prohibition as consuming blood?
Was it in the 1870s?
08 Sep 12
1 edit
Originally posted by galveston75Why the dodging - surely we can just agree to disagree? It's a straight forward question. When did the JW organisation start claiming that "blood transfusions" were subject to a biblical prohibition? Was it in the 1870s?
Take care.....
08 Sep 12
Originally posted by galveston75While all options should always be weighed when making medical decisions, there is no reason to avoid a blood transfusion if it is the chosen course of action.
I truly hope that some out there are looking up these links to learn about blood transfusion options that are mch safer then the blood itself offers. But not too many positive comments so far...
- Joined
- 16 Feb 08
- Moves
- 116952
08 Sep 12
Originally posted by galveston75Yet another JWs and blood" thread.
Protect your family....
http://en.az24.info/blood-transfusions-alternatives-treatments.html
http://www.noblood.org/
ttp://www.noblood.org/ask-professional/4273-anemia-blood-transfusion-alternatives/
http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/TreatmentsandSideEffects/TreatmentTypes/BloodProductDonationandTransfusion/blood-product-donation-and-transfusi ...[text shortened]... /www.testigosdejehova.org/e/19990308/article_01.htm
http://www.medscape.com/index/list_3264_0
Really Galveston, this is becoming more exciting than the "full counter measures" scene in The Hunt for Red October.
08 Sep 12
Originally posted by galveston75in this case, yes you are.
Yez cause we iz willy, willy bad peoples.....
i have no issues with you believing any insanity you want. it is only a problem when you endanger someone else, namely your jw children. any parent refusing blood transfusion for his child is no parent at all and is as abusive as parents who starve their children. even more so.
08 Sep 12
Originally posted by galveston75child comes into the ER, he has been in an accident. lost X% of his blood. what safer course of action would you recommend? he will die without blood in 10 minutes.
I truly hope that some out there are looking up these links to learn about blood transfusion options that are mch safer then the blood itself offers. But not too many positive comments so far...