Originally posted by galveston75So far medically there is no substitution for blood or it's parts......So you really have no clue except spouting and believing in the mindless drivel from the Watchtower which has no basis in reality or with the bible and it's true intent .
If youd actually READ any of those links, you have the answer.
Manny
I wonder if Galvanisation would give his own blood to save his child's life?
If he wouldn't, then he should not be a parent.
'Selfish, unto the end, I say.' But maybe he likes to hide in a world of child sexual molestation, as that is ok in his JW world, for the children should "forgive" the sinners, sorry - their brethren, aunts, uncles, grandparents, and even their own parents' ...
Do you get off, on her, Galvanisation? Your bible, I mean.
-m.
- Joined
- 16 Jan 07
- Moves
- 95105
Originally posted by galveston75is it true that that j.w's used to also preach that the use of vaccinations were against gods will, but then changed their minds 30yrs later when the overwhelming evidence showed how good vaccinations were?
Protect your family....
http://en.az24.info/blood-transfusions-alternatives-treatments.html
http://www.noblood.org/
ttp://www.noblood.org/ask-professional/4273-anemia-blood-transfusion-alternatives/
http://www.cancer.org/Treatment/TreatmentsandSideEffects/TreatmentTypes/BloodProductDonationandTransfusion/blood-product-donation-and-transfusi ...[text shortened]... /www.testigosdejehova.org/e/19990308/article_01.htm
http://www.medscape.com/index/list_3264_0
-Removed-So you don't really believe what you claim to believe? Or you are simply not logical when it comes to your children? Or something else?
I just noticed that you didn't say you would go against what you believed, you said you would go against what your religion teaches. That is subtly different from what I actually asked.
Note that Abraham was given an even harder choice, yet chose the opposite to you.
-Removed-An honest answer.
But I don't understand it. Why do you place such a high value on the lives of your loved ones? Do you not believe in life after death? Is your belief in God only partial? Or is it just your emotional response that overrides the logic of the situation? (ie you will save their lives even if it doesn't make sense).
Originally posted by galveston75it is a defining feature of this forum, that reasoning adults are required to debate scientific facts as if they are open to debate, simply because fundamentalist nutjobs like yourself are unable to believe anything other than what their dogma dictates.
If youd actually READ any of those links, you have the answer.
we debate noah's flood, a young earth, evolution, genetics, even though it is proven beyond any reasonable doubt that noah's flood didn't happen, a young earth is impossible, evolution is an established scientific fact and so on. there can be no debate, you either understand evolution or you don't, there is no believing it. you either understand geology, physics, chemistry, genetics, etc, or you don't, and anyone of your watchtower "scientists" are from the latter category.
now you dare come and claim blood transfusions, a medical practice that saves countless lives, is useless? that we should all abandon it based on an idiotic religious belief, that is not even god's will, from a book all Christians have ceased to follow it and the jewish simply ignore it? how insane are you, on a scale of 1 to religious nutjob?
Originally posted by twhiteheadit is pointless to ask him that, because in your hypothesis, he is barking mad. the more important question is directed at the authorities and goes a little like "how long until the social services come and take away the child from an unfit parent". assuming the child recovers from his life saving medical procedures which the doctor should be allowed and required to perform despite the nutjob parent's wishes
Just as a matter or interest. If you had a choice between letting your child die and doing something you believe (as part of your religion) is totally against Gods will, what would you do?