1 edit
@secondson saidOf course I understand your nonsense. Im smart enough, but it does not register as a doctrine of value. because it contradicts Christ.
So you're saying you understand nonsense and gibberish.
Then why can't you understand what you're saying?
Like Jesus said, His sheep hear HIS VOICE... not yours.
You cannot understand Christ because you are not one of the sheep.
Goats like you are doomed for damnation because you preach disobedience to Christ.
@rajk999 saidSounds like you think yours is the voice of Christ.
Of course I understand your nonsense. Im smart enough, but it does not register as a doctrine of value. because it contradicts Christ.
Like Jesus said, His sheep hear HIS VOICE... not yours.
You cannot understand Christ because you are not one of the sheep.
Goats like you are doomed for damnation because you preach disobedience to Christ.
1 edit
@secondson saidYou really are a very stupid man.
Sounds like you think yours is the voice of Christ.
I quote the teachings of Christ.
You preach the doctrine of men
Anyone who does not stay with the teaching of Christ, but goes beyond it, does not have God.
Whoever does stay with the teaching has both the Father and the Son. (2 John 1:9 GNB)
@secondson saidOh the irony.
I don't think you could sum up the fingers of your hand. Obviously you're bristling with disdain and contempt, and pent-up anger, resentment with an unforgiving spirit.
1 edit
What isn’t supported in scripture is using biblical principles, or statutes, or explanations as a weapon to fire at non Christians on an Internet forum. Immediate intellectual defeat results for the Christian who does this.
Could you show us in scripture where using terms like "hairdryer" and "waffle" are to be used as weapons toward Christians trying to help people understand something of God's eternal purpose?
1 edit
When you get called “the hairdryer” or accused of “waffling” it is not because those posters are trying to help you “understand God’s eternal purpose.”
Sometimes these expressions of contempt were used by you because you wanted to show scorn, disrespect, and depreciation for discussion of God's eternal purpose.
I know exactly what happened.
Are you the only one who is sensitive how the reactions of hearers express their attitudes?
Firstly you think you know it all anyway and are just here to teach us poor saps the way to get Jesus flowing through us.
Firstly, one does not have to "know it all" in order to know SOMETHING and respectfully share it with others.
"Poor saps" is your slander. I respect fellow human beings to whom I am speaking something of God's economy. YOU imagine that to share the good news is to automatically consider the hearers as "poor saps".
Secondly these are secular comments designed to help you see that you are being a longwinded prideful blowhard.
Second of all, I have admitted verbosity and longwindedness.
And I think people who are really eager to hear the Gospel do not easily get stumbled by the messenger. If they are really interested in the Gospel they are not so quick to insult the messenger.
You can always say "I am aware of those things" if one is already aware.
One can disagree if one has a different understanding.
The Bereans were noble and examined the Scriptures to see whether these things were so. Something seems wrong to one feeling the need to lash out with insults to someone conveying subject matter about the Gospel.
Btw, how’s that “ball in your court” over those checkmate questions I asked you...?
I think concerning the triune God (and sometimes other subjects) you imagine that some contrived question is too difficult and scary as to be a checkmate of some kind.
I usually take this to mean that if the words you wish to come out of the person's mouth do not come out just as you want them to, that is a "checkmate" question being run away from.
I don't think you realize how silly this self congratulations of yours looks to some others.