Yeah, this thing will be great... until a couple have an arguement, supposedly sort out their differences, then during the deed, it turns out the women is still rather upset and has got one of theses for some revenge.
So if a guy was set up by a woman for this kind of thing, wouldn't that be assault?1 Would we have a society where we would have 2 people claiming against the other; one for rape, and one for assault?!
Originally posted by welsharnieVery well said.
Yeah, this thing will be great... until a couple have an arguement, supposedly sort out their differences, then during the deed, it turns out the women is still rather upset and has got one of theses for some revenge.
So if a guy was set up by a woman for this kind of thing, wouldn't that be assault?1 Would we have a society where we would have 2 people claiming against the other; one for rape, and one for assault?!
Originally posted by aardvarkhomeYou are reading meaning into my post which is not there. I simply said that a woman who uses one of these should expect her rapist to hurt her even worse because of it. That is not a moral judgement, but rather advice; use of this device will anger a rapist and the woman should be aware of this fact for her own good.
You appear to be condoning violence against women.
EDIT - Oops, I already addressed that post.