20 Mar '06 10:10>
Originally posted by dj2beckerI guess you're just going to have to unequivocally prove that god exists then.
Me thinks you are the one detatched from reality, as God is reality.
Originally posted by dj2beckerMy meaning in life? Having fun, meeting a nice girl, educating people, finding the truth - the real truth, not some silly bogeyman.
None of you seem to be able to answer the simple question that I asked...
So OK, I get it.
I am not trying to validate or invalidate your meaning in life. I simply wish to know what your meaning in life would be, as I cannot imagine what the meaning of my life would be without God.
Originally posted by knightmeisterGood grief.
I want to know why Theists are always being accused of having an illusionary coping mechanism (ie God) when it seems to me that Athieists that talk about 'love' and 'meaning' are involved in a form of comforting self delusion by refusing to accept that, taken to it's logical conclusion, Atheism = Nihilism. Is this how Atheists cope ? By not facing the ...[text shortened]... ere are the real Atheists who have popped the bubble? It all sounds far too cosy!
Originally posted by dj2beckerSure, it might be nice if there was some fairy-god in the sky to pat you on the back after a hard day, but that doesn't mean it's true. Just because you think life would be better with some god lurking in the background doesn't make it true either. If we're going to invent deities to help reassure us in our daily tribulations, then I think you could do a lot better than the god you've come up with thus far. I think you've sold yourself a little short.
The use of children was just the most obvious example. I could insert family or friends in there just as easily. Atheists are perfectly capable of caring the wellbeing of the people who will survive them.
What type of meaning would an atheist have if all he were to lose all friends and family?
Are you claiming that someone who was paralyzed only find meaning in such circumstances if I remembered how much Jesus suffered for me.
Originally posted by StarrmanDo you then agree that just because you cannot imagine it, this does not mean it is not there?
Do you then agree that just because you cannot imagine it, this does not mean it is not there?
If you agree with this I will be happy to expound my view on your question.
Originally posted by dj2beckerI can imagine god and if I could not, I would not use it as any justification of proof against him.
[b]Do you then agree that just because you cannot imagine it, this does not mean it is not there?
Sure. I sometimes wonder if you ever ask yourself the same question about God.
If you agree with this I will be happy to expound my view on your question.
I agree that I cannot imagine it. I do however think that you must in some way assum ...[text shortened]... o have some form of meaning, even if I may not agree with you that that is what true meaning is.[/b]
Originally posted by twhiteheadThe existance of life after death usually implies eternity in 'heaven' or 'hell', which affects the meaning of life before death, as that would determine where you would spend eternity after death.
How does the existance of life after death affect the meaning of life before death ?
Originally posted by StarrmanI can imagine god and if I could not, I would not use it as any justification of proof against him.
I can imagine god and if I could not, I would not use it as any justification of proof against him.
What then is true meaning, before I go on? If this is going to be a circular argument there's little point in continuing.
Originally posted by dj2beckerNo it doent affect the meaning but only determines where you spend eternity. Your location through eternity has little to do with meaning.
The existance of life after death usually implies eternity in 'heaven' or 'hell', which affects the meaning of life before death, as that would determine where you would spend eternity after death.