2 edits
Originally posted by KellyJayThat's great, but it doesn't answer my question.
I'm not shouting, here I have presented my own arguments, what I get
from you is there are others out there that disagree. I really don't see you
standing up for your own point of view.
So does this view of yours that scientists who have a 'bias' towards evolution because 'they believe' extend to the other scientists in scientific fields which contradict your position?
2 edits
Originally posted by Proper KnobYea I saw that you highlighted that which makes your view look good, and
[quote]Bias is an inclination of temperament or outlook to present or hold a partial perspective, [b]often accompanied by a refusal to consider the possible merits of alternative points of view. People may be biased toward or against an individual, a race, a religion, a social class, a political party, or a species. Biased means one-sided, lacking ...[text shortened]... Would you say that is a refusal on my part to consider the merits of alternative points of view?
didn't bother with that which backup mine!
1 edit
Originally posted by Proper KnobThat fits you and sunhouse very well.
I disagree. You're using a non standard definition of the word 'bias'.
'Bias is an inclination of temperament or outlook to present or hold a partial perspective, often accompanied by a refusal to consider the possible merits of alternative points of view. People may be biased toward or against an individual, a race, a religion, a social class, a poli ...[text shortened]... nd is often considered to be synonymous with prejudice or bigotry.[2]
Form the wiki for bias.
And C Hess too.
