Originally posted by KellyJayThat's great, but it doesn't answer my question.
I'm not shouting, here I have presented my own arguments, what I get
from you is there are others out there that disagree. I really don't see you
standing up for your own point of view.
So does this view of yours that scientists who have a 'bias' towards evolution because 'they believe' extend to the other scientists in scientific fields which contradict your position?
Originally posted by Proper KnobYea I saw that you highlighted that which makes your view look good, and
[quote]Bias is an inclination of temperament or outlook to present or hold a partial perspective, [b]often accompanied by a refusal to consider the possible merits of alternative points of view. People may be biased toward or against an individual, a race, a religion, a social class, a political party, or a species. Biased means one-sided, lacking ...[text shortened]... Would you say that is a refusal on my part to consider the merits of alternative points of view?
didn't bother with that which backup mine!
Originally posted by Proper KnobThat fits you and sunhouse very well.
I disagree. You're using a non standard definition of the word 'bias'.
'Bias is an inclination of temperament or outlook to present or hold a partial perspective, often accompanied by a refusal to consider the possible merits of alternative points of view. People may be biased toward or against an individual, a race, a religion, a social class, a poli ...[text shortened]... nd is often considered to be synonymous with prejudice or bigotry.[2]
Form the wiki for bias.
And C Hess too.