Originally posted by RJHindsokay.
As the Instructor, I am limited in my instruction to those spiritual matters that concern the Holy Bible and guidance by the anointing of the Holy Spirit.
The Instructor
my friend is debating which faith he should follow. his options are to become a muslim, sikh or a shintoist, what is your spiritual advice?
Originally posted by RJHindsSuzi is naive [compared to r.j.]
I was making light of the stupid questions. And I was expecting him to respond with some comment about a fifth of wiskey, but I never expected such a comment coming from such a sweet, naive lady, like yourself. Have I grossly misjudged your naivety?
The Instructor
Who else thinks that?
Originally posted by SuzianneC'mon. Actually I really wanted hear the r.j. version. But really I don't adamantly disbelieve the premise , i have on numerous occasions said that Christianity is a valid way to "God" or at least more refined spirituality as I have seen people's lives change via Christianity first hand.
No. You already adamantly disbelieve the premise. It would be like preaching to a stone.
Originally posted by karoly aczelBut your use of quotations around God means that to you, it's only an abstract concept. To Christians, God is very real.
C'mon. Actually I really wanted hear the r.j. version. But really I don't adamantly disbelieve the premise , i have on numerous occasions said that Christianity is a valid way to "God" or at least more refined spirituality as I have seen people's lives change via Christianity first hand.
Originally posted by Suziannethe use of quotations marks is to indicate that my version of what is known as "God" with a big 'g', is vastly different to the Christian version. It's not an abstract concept
But your use of quotations around God means that to you, it's only an abstract concept. To Christians, God is very real.
Originally posted by karoly aczelI think intelligence is hot.
I know. I hope you don't mind me backing you up on that one. Despite our difference in ontology, I think your pretty hot.
(I had to look up ontology on Wikipedia. I'm not real big on Philosophy, in school I barely passed the mandatory courses in it.)
Originally posted by karoly aczelHmmm, yes, perhaps I spoke out of turn. I do understand your version of God is different than mine. But when you make fun of the Christian God as being a 'sky fairy', it makes me think maybe you're thinking it's too abstract to be real.
the use of quotations marks is to indicate that my version of what is known as "God" with a big 'g', is vastly different to the Christian version. It's not an abstract concept